Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28966340›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor basic research2017

A New Clinically Relevant T-Score Standard to Interpret Bone Status in a Sheep Model.

Christian Heiss, Stefanie Kern, Deeksha Malhan, Wolfgang Böcker, Markus Engelhardt, Diaa Eldin S Daghma, Sabine Stoetzel, Jakob Schmitt, Matthias Ivo, Vivien Kauschke and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor basic research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ex Vivo Evaluation of Hip Fracture Risk by Proximal Femur Geometry and Bone Mineral Density in Elderly Chinese Women.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Christian HeissDepartment of Experimental Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Stefanie KernDepartment of Experimental Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Deeksha MalhanDepartment of Experimental Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Wolfgang BöckerDepartment of Experimental Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Markus EngelhardtDepartment of Experimental Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Diaa Eldin S DaghmaDepartment of Experimental Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Sabine StoetzelDepartment of Experimental Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Jakob SchmittDepartment of Experimental Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Matthias IvoDepartment of Experimental Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Vivien KauschkeDepartment of Experimental Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Katrin S LipsDepartment of Experimental Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Kamen TushtevAdvanced Ceramics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Kurosch RezwanAdvanced Ceramics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Thaqif El KhassawnaDepartment of Experimental Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Osteoporosis is diagnosed by bone loss using a radiological parameter called T-score. Preclinical studies use DXA to evaluate bone status were the T-score is referenced on bone mineral density (BMD) values of the same animals before treatment. Clinically, the reference BMD represents values of an independent group of healthy patients around 30 years old. The present study established a clinically similar T-score standard to diagnose osteoporosis in a sheep model. MATERIAL AND METHODS We used 31 female merino land sheep (average 5.5 years old) to study osteoporosis. The following groups were compared using DXA measurement: 1) control; 2) ovariectomized (OVX); 3) OVX combined with a deficient diet (OVXD); and 4) OVXD combined with methylprednisolone administration (OVXDS). Further, an independent group of 32 healthy sheep (4-6 years old) were measured as an independent baseline. BMD was measured at 0 months, 3 months, and 8 months after treatment. RESULTS The same significance pattern between the treated groups and either baseline groups was seen. However, using an independent baseline changed the "clinical" interpretation of the data from an osteoporotic bone status (T-score <-2.5) after 3 months of OXDS treatment into an osteopenic bone status (T-score <-1.5 to -2.4). CONCLUSIONS Using an independent baseline enhanced the statistical significance and showed the clinical relevance. Furthermore, an independent baseline is a reliable alternative to use of a new control group for future experiments and thus reduces the number of animals needed by eliminating the need for a control and corresponding to clinical practice.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone and BonesBone DensityDisease Models, AnimalFemaleMethylprednisoloneOsteoporosisOvariectomySheepMethylprednisolone

Identifiers

PMID28966340
PMCPMC5637575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.