Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28966050›Full record

ReviewTrends in parasitology2017

Malaria Epidemiology at the Clone Level.

Cristian Koepfli, Ivo Mueller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in parasitology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biology and epidemiology ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Recent Advances in Imported Malaria Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management.Current emergency and hospital medicine reports · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. PNAS nexus · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cristian KoepfliUniversity of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute for Medical Research, Parkville, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. Electronic address: ckoepfli@uci.edu.
Ivo MuellerWalter and Eliza Hall Institute for Medical Research, Parkville, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Malaria: Parasites & Hosts Unit, Department of Parasites & Insect Vectors, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.

Funding

Vector Biology of Invasive Anopheles stephensi in Rural to Urban Landscapes in EthiopiaU19AI129326 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Guiyun Yan · 2017 to 2026
$19.9M
Understanding, tracking and eliminating malaria transmission in the Asia - Pacific RegionU19AI129392 · NIAID · WALTER AND ELIZA HALL INST MEDICAL RES · PI Ivo J Mueller, Leanne Robinson · 2017 to 2026
$7.1M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI129326NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI129392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotyping to distinguish between parasite clones is nowadays a standard in many molecular epidemiological studies of malaria. It has become crucial in drug trials and to follow individual clones in epidemiological studies, and to understand how drug resistance emerges and spreads. Here, we review the applications of the increasingly available genotyping tools and whole-genome sequencing data, and argue for a better integration of population genetics findings into malaria-control strategies.

Indexed as

Drug ResistanceGenetics, PopulationGenotypeHumansMalariaPlasmodiumWhole Genome Sequencingdrug resistancemicrosatelliteparasite migrationrelapseSNPwhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID28966050
PMCPMC5777529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.