ArticleClinical drug investigation2018
A Comparison of Adverse Drug Reaction Profiles in Patients on Antiretroviral and Antitubercular Treatment in Zimbabwe.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Characteristics of isoniazid-induced psychosis: a systematic review of case reports and case series.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- An analysis of the trends, characteristics, scope, and performance of the Zimbabwean pharmacovigilance reporting scheme.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2020Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFew studies describe the adverse drug event profiles in patients simultaneously receiving antiretroviral and anti-tubercular medicines in resource-limited countries.
objectivesTo describe and compare the adverse drug reaction profiles in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy only (HAART), HAART and isoniazid preventive therapy (HHART), and HAART and antitubercular treatment (ATTHAART).
methodsWe analysed individual case safety reports (ICSRs) for patients on antiretroviral therapy and antitubercular treatment submitted to the national pharmacovigilance centre during the targeted spontaneous reporting (TSR) programme from 1 September 2012 through 31 August 2016. All reports considered certain, probable or possible were included in the analysis.
resultsA total of 1076 ICSRs were included in the analysis. Most of the reports were from the HAART only group (n = 882; 82.0%), followed by patients on HHART (n = 132; 12.3%), and ATTHAART (n = 62; 5.7%). The ATTHAART (35.5%) and HHAART (34.1%) had a higher frequency of hepatic disorders than the HAART group (5.0%) (p < 0.0001). A higher frequency of rash was reported in the HHAART (35.6%) and HAART groups (29.4%) than the ATTHAART group (14.5%) (p = 0.011). Peripheral neuropathy occurred more frequently in the ATTHAART group (19.3%) than other groups (p = 0.001) while Stevens-Johnson syndrome (14.7%; p < 0.001), gynaecomastia (18.2%; p < 0.001), and lipodystrophy (4.5%; p = 0.012) occurred more frequently in the HAART group. The HHAART group was associated with a higher frequency of psychosis (4.5%; p = 0.002).
conclusionAntiretroviral therapy was associated with a higher frequency of Stevens-Johnson syndrome, gynaecomastia, and lipodystrophy. Co-administration of antiretroviral and antitubercular medicines was associated with a higher frequency of drug-induced liver injury and peripheral neuropathy. Similarly, co-administration of isoniazid preventive therapy and antiretroviral drugs was associated with a higher risk for psychosis. There is a need to carefully manage TB/HIV co-infected patients, due to the higher risk of adverse drug reactions which may lead to poor treatment adherence and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28965312What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.