ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2017
Resumption of Anticoagulation After Intracranial Hemorrhage.
Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of pharmacist-led interventions on the appropriateness and clinical outcomes of anticoagulant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2024Pooled it
- Postoperative Rebleeding: The Sword of Damocles in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Coagulation Tests and Reversal Agents in Patients Treated with Oral Anticoagulants: The Challenging Scenarios of Life-Threatening Bleeding and Unplanned Invasive Procedures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Stroke Prevention With Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Prior Intracranial Hemorrhage.CJC open · 2023Article
- Management of oral anticoagulant therapy after intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Risk factors for intracerebral hemorrhage in patients with COVID-19.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2021Article
- Anticoagulation Resumption in a Patient With Mechanical Heart Valves, Antithrombin Deficiency, and Hemorrhagic Transformation Following Thrombectomy After Ischemic Stroke.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementAnticoagulation is a vital therapy in a number of different disease processes, and is strongly recommended for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and/or with mechanical prosthetic heart valves. Studies involving patients on oral anticoagulants (OACs) have revealed that ICH can occur eight times more frequently in this population, with an annual estimated incidence of 0.25 to 1.1%. The decision of whether and when to resume anticoagulation following intracranial hemorrhage is challenging and requires an assessment of associated risks and benefits. Clinical data, imaging, and risk factors for both ischemic and hemorrhagic complications may aid in decision-making. Baseline functional status, life expectancy, compliance with therapy, and family support also impact decision analyses. Currently available data suggest that anticoagulation could be safely restarted in select groups of OAC-ICH patients within 4 weeks of intracranial hemorrhage; however, high-quality randomized, clinical trials are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.