Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28965141›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2018

Climate change and spring frost damages for sweet cherries in Germany.

Frank-M Chmielewski, Klaus-P Götz, Katharina C Weber, Susanne Moryson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frank-M ChmielewskiFaculty of Life Sciences, Thaer Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Professorship of Agricultural Climatology, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 5, 14195, Berlin, Germany. chmielew@agrar.hu-berlin.de.
Klaus-P GötzFaculty of Life Sciences, Thaer Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Professorship of Agricultural Climatology, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 5, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Katharina C WeberFaculty of Life Sciences, Thaer Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Professorship of Agricultural Climatology, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 5, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Susanne MorysonFaculty of Life Sciences, Thaer Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Professorship of Agricultural Climatology, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 5, 14195, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) CH 228/5-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spring frost can be a limiting factor in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) production. Rising temperatures in spring force the development of buds, whereby their vulnerability to freezing temperatures continuously increases. With the beginning of blossom, flowers can resist only light frosts without any significant damage. In this study, we investigated the risk of spring frost damages during cherry blossom for historical and future climate conditions at two different sites in NE (Berlin) and SW Germany (Geisenheim). Two phenological models, developed on the basis of phenological observations at the experimental sweet cherry orchard in Berlin-Dahlem and validated for endodormancy release and for warmer climate conditions (already published), were used to calculate the beginning of cherry blossom in Geisenheim, 1951-2015 (external model validation). Afterwards, on the basis of a statistical regionalisation model WETTREG (RCP 8.5), the frequency of frost during cherry blossom was calculated at both sites for historical (1971-2000) and future climate conditions (2011-2100). From these data, we derived the final flower damage, defined as the percentage of frozen flowers due to single or multiple frost events during blossom. The results showed that rising temperatures in this century can premature the beginning of cherry blossom up to 17 days at both sites, independent of the used phenological model. The frequency and strength of frost was characterised by a high temporal and local variability. For both sites, no significant increase in frost frequency and frost damage during blossom was found. In Geisenheim, frost damages significantly decreased from the middle of the twenty-first century. This study additionally emphasises the importance of reliable phenological models which not only work for current but also for changed climate conditions and at different sites. The date of endodormancy release should always be a known parameter in chilling/forcing models.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeFreezingModels, TheoreticalFlowersFruitGermanyPrunus aviumSeasonsClimate scenariosFlower damageLate frostPhenological modelsPrunus avium L.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.