ArticleLasers in medical science2017
Epigenetic changes in preimplantation embryos subjected to laser manipulation.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epigenetic Risks of Medically Assisted Reproduction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Non-Assisted Hatching Trophectoderm Biopsy Does Not Increase The Risks of Most Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcome and May Be More Practical for Busy Clinics: Evidence From China.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- The effect of laser-assisted hatching on the methylation and expression pattern of imprinted gene IGF2/H19 in mouse blastocysts and offspring.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advantage of using laser for assisted hatching in routine assisted reproductive technology (ART) practice is debatable. Recently, it has been shown that laser-manipulated mouse embryos had compromised genetic integrity. However, the impact of laser-assisted hatching (LAH) on the epigenetic integrity of the preimplantation embryos is not elucidated so far. Since continuous thermal stress on embryos was found to lower mRNA levels of de novo (bovine) methyl transferases in embryos, we hypothesize that thermal energy induced during LAH may alter the epigenetic signature through abnormal de novo methyl transferases (Dnmts) levels. Thus, using mouse model, we made an attempt to look into the expression of Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b in laser-manipulated embryos and their effects on global methylation. This experimental prospective study used mouse embryos from varying developmental stages (2-cell, 6-8-cell, and blastocyst) which were subjected to LAH using a 1480-nm diode laser. Two pulses of 350 μs frequency were applied to breach the zona pellucida, and then, embryos were assessed for the expression of two de novo methyl transferases (Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b) and LINE-1 (long interspersed element-1) methylation when LAH embryos developed to blastocyst stage. Results from this study have shown that blastocysts subjected to LAH at two-cell stage had significantly lower mRNA transcripts of Dnmt3a (P < 0.01) and Dnmt3b (P < 0.05) whereas LAH at six- to eight-cell and blastocyst stages did not affect the mRNA level significantly. On the other hand, LINE-1 methylation did not change significantly between LAH and control group in all the stages studied. These results suggest that two-cell-stage laser manipulation of embryos changes the mRNA level of Dnmts without affecting the global DNA methylation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.