Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28964987›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2018

Potential for gulls to transport bacteria from human waste sites to beaches.

Elizabeth W Alm, Quri R Daniels-Witt, Deric R Learman, Hodon Ryu, Dustin W Jordan, Thomas M Gehring, Jorge Santo Domingo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. High abundance ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils fromPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Antimicrobial Resistance and Pathotypes ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Climate Change Impacts on Microbiota in Beach Sand and Water: Looking Ahead.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Intestinal Microbes of Hooded Cranes (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antibiotic Resistance in Recreational Waters: State of the Science.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth W AlmDepartment of Biology & Institute for Great Lakes Research, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, United States. Electronic address: alm1ew@cmich.edu.
Quri R Daniels-WittDepartment of Biology & Institute for Great Lakes Research, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, United States.
Deric R LearmanDepartment of Biology & Institute for Great Lakes Research, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, United States.
Hodon RyuU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Water Supply Water Resources Division, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.
Dustin W JordanDepartment of Biology & Institute for Great Lakes Research, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, United States.
Thomas M GehringDepartment of Biology & Institute for Great Lakes Research, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, United States.
Jorge Santo DomingoU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Water Supply Water Resources Division, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contamination of recreational beaches due to fecal waste from gulls complicates beach monitoring and may pose a risk to public health. Gulls that feed at human waste sites may ingest human fecal microorganisms associated with that waste. If these gulls also visit beaches, they may serve as vectors, transporting fecal microorganisms to the beach where they may subsequently contaminate sand and water. In this study, samples collected from landfills, treated wastewater storage lagoons, and public beaches demonstrated a spatial and temporal overlap of markers for gull and human-associated microorganisms. In addition, markers for gull, fecal indicator bacteria, and the human-associated marker, HF183, were detected in gull feces and cloacae samples. Further, HF183 was detected in cloacae samples from gulls that were documented by radio-telemetry traveling between human waste sites and public beaches. This study highlights the potential for gulls that visit human waste sites to disperse human-associated microorganisms in the beach landscape.

Indexed as

Bathing BeachesEnvironmental MonitoringWater MicrobiologyAnimalsBacteriaCharadriiformesFecesHumansBeachesFecal indicator bacteriaFecal pollutionGull transportMicrobial source tracking

Identifiers

PMID28964987
PMCPMC6754825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.