Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28964820›Full record

ArticleUrology2018

Effect of Stone Size and Composition on Ultrasonic Propulsion Ex Vivo.

Karmon M Janssen, Timothy C Brand, Michael R Bailey, Bryan W Cunitz, Jonathan D Harper, Mathew D Sorensen, Barbrina Dunmire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The effect of shear waves in an elastic sphere on the radiation force from a quasi-Gaussian beam.Proceedings of meetings on acoustics. Acoustical Society of America · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Characterizing the Acoustic Output of an Ultrasonic Propulsion Device for Urinary Stones.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karmon M JanssenMadigan Army Medical Center, Urology Department, Tacoma, WA. Electronic address: karmonjanssen@gmail.com.
Timothy C BrandMadigan Army Medical Center, Urology Department, Tacoma, WA.
Michael R BaileyCenter for Industrial and Medical Ultrasound, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Bryan W CunitzCenter for Industrial and Medical Ultrasound, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Jonathan D HarperDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Mathew D SorensenDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Division of Urology, Department of Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
Barbrina DunmireCenter for Industrial and Medical Ultrasound, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
University of Washington · USMadigan Army Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory · US

Funding

SWL AND RENAL INJURY AND STONE COMMINUTIONP01DK043881 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LIU, ZIYUE · 1994 to 2023
$33.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK043881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate in more detail the effectiveness of a new designed more efficient ultrasonic propulsion for large stones and specific stone compositions in a tissue phantom model. In the first clinical trial of noninvasive ultrasonic propulsion, urinary stones of unknown compositions and sizes up to 10 mm were successfully repositioned. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study included 8- to 12-mm stones of 4 different primary compositions (calcium oxalate monohydrate, ammonium acid urate, calcium phosphate, and struvite) and a renal calyx phantom consisting of a 12 mm × 30 mm well in a 10-cm block of tissue-mimicking material. Primary outcome was the number of times a stone was expelled over 10 attempts, with ultrasonic propulsion burst duration varying from 0.5 seconds to 5 seconds.

resultsOverall success rate at expelling stones was 95%. All calcium oxalate monohydrate and ammonium acid urate stones were expelled 100% of the time. The largest stone (12 mm) became lodged within the 12-mm phantom calyx 25% of the time regardless of the burst duration. With the 0.5-second burst, there was insufficient energy to expel the heaviest stone (0.88 g), but there was sufficient energy at the longer burst durations.

conclusionWith a single burst, ultrasonic propulsion successfully moved most stones at least 3 cm and, regardless of size or composition, expelled them from the calyx. Ultrasonic propulsion is limited to the stones smaller than the calyceal space, and for each burst duration, related to maximum stone mass.

Indexed as

Kidney CalicesUltrasonic TherapyHumansKidney CalculiPhantoms, Imaging

Identifiers

PMID28964820
PMCPMC5875927
OpenAlexW2758982519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.