Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28964559›Full record

Observational studyPatient education and counseling2018

Communication among cancer patients, caregivers, and hospice nurses: Content, process and change over time.

Lee Ellington, Margaret F Clayton, Maija Reblin, Gary Donaldson, Seth Latimer

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Patient education and counseling, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Factors, including patient education, that impact cancer treatment adherence in low- and middle-income African countries: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. ThePalliative medicine · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lee EllingtonCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Margaret F ClaytonCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Maija ReblinDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA. Electronic address: maija.reblin@moffitt.org.
Gary DonaldsonCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Seth LatimerCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.

Funding

Symptom Care by Phone for Hospice Caregiver Support and Cancer Symptom ReliefP01CA138317 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MOONEY, KATHLEEN H · 2010 to 2015
$7.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA138317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFirst, to describe communication of home hospice nurse visits to cancer patient-caregiver dyads. Second, to assess change in communication related to domains of care over the course of visits.

methodsMulti-site prospective observational longitudinal study of audio-recorded home hospice visits (N=537 visits; 101 patient-caregiver dyads; 58 nurses). Communication was coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System to describe content and process. Conversation representing three care domains (physical, psychosocial/daily life, and emotional) was calculated from RIAS categories across speakers and analyzed to assess change in communication over time.

resultsOn average, nurses spoke 54% of total utterances, caregivers 29%, and patients 17%. For all participants, the predominant conversational focus was on physical care. Linear mixed effects models indicated that combined participant emotional talk showed a small systematic decrease over time; however, the results for all domains indicated variability unexplained by time or speaker effects.

conclusionsHome hospice conversations are predominantly focused on physical care. Systematic change in communication versus responsiveness to the dynamic effects of patient death and family response over time are discussed. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Communication strategies already in use by hospice nurses could be leveraged and expanded upon to better facilitate family competence and confidence.

Indexed as

CommunicationProfessional-Family RelationsProfessional-Patient RelationsAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversEmotionsFemaleHospice CareHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNursing StaffProspective StudiesCancerCaregiverCommunicationHospice careLongitudinal studies

Identifiers

PMID28964559
PMCPMC5857410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.