ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2018
Is bone analysis with μCT useful for short postmortem interval estimation?
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human Decomposition and Time Since Death: Persistent Challenges and Future Directions of Postmortem Interval Estimation in Forensic Anthropology.American journal of biological anthropology · 2024Pooled it
- Application and implications of radiocarbon dating in forensic case work: when medico-legal significance meets archaeological relevance.Forensic sciences research · 2024Article
- Review
- Evaluation of Parameters for Estimating the Postmortem Interval of Skeletal Remains Using Bovine Femurs: A Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evaluation of the postmortem interval (PMI) is an important consideration in forensic medicine. The time between death and the discovery thereof is extremely important, not only in terms of the legal process, but also for the course of the investigation. At the time of the discovery of human bones, the evaluation of the PMI is extremely difficult. To date, there is no really effective tool for this evaluation. The objective of our study is to characterize the architectural modifications of human bones using micro-tomography (μCT) in the postmortem period. Ten bone samples were extracted from a single fresh human cranial vault (no freezing, no embalming) from a body donation. The samples were conserved in a controlled environment (a laboratory hood at 20 °C with 60% humidity) for 10 weeks. Every 2 weeks after the death and the sample extraction from the vault, the samples were analyzed with μCT (resolution 10 μm, Bruker HR1172 ®). The 3D analysis focused on general 3D data related to the trabeculae: the total volume (TV), the bone volume (BV), and the bone surface (BS), as well as specific trabeculae data; namely: the number of trabeculae (TbN), trabecular thickness (TbTh), the average distance between the trabeculae (TbSp), and the trabecular pattern factor (TbPf). Each sample was observed separately and compared to itself over time; no comparisons among samples were made. We used a linear mixed model for repeated measures (an unstructured covariance pattern model) and post hoc comparisons between each consecutive time using linear contrast with an SAS software package, release 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). We showed a statistical difference for BS/BV (p = 0.046) over time, with a significant decrease during the first 2 weeks (p = 0.003; mean decrease, - 0.99, 95% CI [- 1.61; - 0.36]), while TbSp (p < 0.0001) showed a significant increase during the first 2 weeks (p < 0.0001; mean increase, 0.022, 95% CI, [- 0.016; - 0.028]).Our study highlighted architectural trabecular modifications on postmortem bones using the μCT. These modifications occurred at an early stage, during the first 2 weeks of conservation. Complementary work will need to be performed to allow for better understanding of the biological phenomena observed and to create databases of osseous taphonomy, starting with various individuals, mediums of conservation, types of bone, and with varying techniques for analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.