Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28963636›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2018

Persistence of DNA on clothes after exposure to water for different time periods-a study on bathtub, pond, and river.

Janine Helmus, Sarah Zorell, Thomas Bajanowski, Micaela Poetsch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of fire extinguishing agents on DNA quantity and integrity.International journal of legal medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interpol review of forensic biology and forensic DNA typing 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020
    Review
  7. Data driven optimization of sexual assault case processing.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janine HelmusInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
Sarah ZorellInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
Thomas BajanowskiInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
Micaela PoetschInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany. micaela.poetsch@uk-essen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1364-6487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA traces on clothes of drowned bodies can provide important evidence for police investigations, especially in cases of suspected suicides or homicides. However, it is generally assumed that the water "erodes" a large part of the DNA depending especially on the exposure time. In forensic casework, DNA of suspects could be found frequently on clothes of drowned bodies after hours, sometimes days of exposure to water. This study was conducted to attempt a general statement about the conditions under which sufficient DNA remains can be expected for molecular genetic analysis. For this purpose, different scenarios were designed including DNA from three to five people, different types of waters (tap, pond, bathtub and river) for various time periods, with higher water pressure, different temperature, and soapy water (bathtub). Epithelial cells and blood cells were mounted on cotton cloths, and the DNA left after exposure was analyzed using the Powerplex® ESX17fast kit. In the indoor experiments, complete profiles could be seen even after 10 min rinsing of clothes under the tap and after 1 week in the bathtub. Outdoors, the results differed considerably between summer and winter as well as between pond and river. The longest exposure time still resulting in a complete profile was 2 weeks for a sample with skin cells in the pond during winter. In summer, the time period for erasing the bulk of DNA was 4 hours regarding epithelial samples and more than 1 day for blood samples in pond and river environments. All in all, the results demonstrate that DNA could still be recovered from clothes exposed to water for more than 1 week.

Indexed as

BathsClothingImmersionPondsRiversAdultDNADNA FingerprintingEpithelial CellsFemaleForensic GeneticsHumansMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsMiddle AgedSeasonsDNADeath in waterLow copy number DNAPersistence of DNASTR analysisWater quality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.