ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2017
Estimation of start and stop numbers for cluster resolution feature selection algorithm: an empirical approach using null distribution analysis of Fisher ratios.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preclinical modeling of metabolic syndrome to study the pleiotropic effects of novel antidiabetic therapy independent of obesity.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Dietary benzoic acid and supplemental enzymes alter fiber-fermenting taxa and metabolites in the cecum of weaned pigs.Journal of animal science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cluster resolution feature selection (CR-FS) is a hybrid feature selection algorithm which involves the evaluation of ranked variables via sequential backward elimination (SBE) and sequential forward selection (SFS). The implementation of CR-FS requires two main inputs, namely, start and stop number. The start number is the number of the highly ranked variables for the SBE while the stop number is the point at which the search for additional features during the SFS stage is halted. The setting of these critical parameters has always relied on trial and error which introduced subjectivity in the results obtained. The start and stop numbers are known to vary with each dataset. Drawing inspiration from overlapping coefficients, a method for comparing two probability density functions, empirical equations toward the estimation of start and stop number for a dataset were developed. All of the parameters in the empirical equations are obtained from the comparisons of the two probability density functions except the constant termed d. The equations were optimized using three real-world datasets. The optimum range of d was determined to be 0.48 to 0.57. An implementation of CR-FS using two new datasets demonstrated the validity of this approach. Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) model prediction accuracies increased from 90 and 96 to 100% for both datasets using start and stop numbers calculated with this approach. Additionally, there was a twofold increase in the explained variance captured in the first two principal components. Graphical abstract Here, we describe how to determine the start and stop numbers for an automated feature selection routine, ensuring that you get the best model you can for your data with minimal effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.