Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28963614›Full record

Trial reportPathology oncology research : POR2019

Efficacy of Vemurafenib Treatment in 43 Metastatic Melanoma Patients with BRAF Mutation. Single-Institute Retrospective Analysis, Early Real-Life Survival Data.

Kata Czirbesz, Eszter Gorka, Tímea Balatoni, Gitta Pánczél, Krisztina Melegh, Péter Kovács, András Gézsi, Gabriella Liszkay

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kata CzirbeszDepartment of Dermatooncology, National Institute of Oncology, H-1122, Ráth György utca 7-9, Budapest, Hungary. czirbikatu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0708-1547
Eszter GorkaDepartment of Dermatooncology, National Institute of Oncology, H-1122, Ráth György utca 7-9, Budapest, Hungary.
Tímea BalatoniDepartment of Dermatooncology, National Institute of Oncology, H-1122, Ráth György utca 7-9, Budapest, Hungary.
Gitta PánczélDepartment of Dermatooncology, National Institute of Oncology, H-1122, Ráth György utca 7-9, Budapest, Hungary.
Krisztina MeleghDepartment of Dermatooncology, National Institute of Oncology, H-1122, Ráth György utca 7-9, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter KovácsDepartment of Dermatooncology, National Institute of Oncology, H-1122, Ráth György utca 7-9, Budapest, Hungary.
András GézsiDepartment of Genetics, Cell- and Immunbiology, Semmelweis University, H-1089, Nagyvárad tér 4, Budapest, Hungary.
Gabriella LiszkayDepartment of Dermatooncology, National Institute of Oncology, H-1122, Ráth György utca 7-9, Budapest, Hungary.
National Institute of Oncology · HUSemmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib achieved improved overall survival over chemotherapy and have been approved by the FDA and EMA for the treatment of BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma. The aim of our retrospective analysis was to determine the efficacy and safety of vemurafenib therapy for BRAF mutated metastatic melanoma and subsequently to prove the clinical benefit for the studied 43 patients, based on real-life data. From November 2012 to October 2015 we have selected 43 BRAF mutated, metastatic melanoma patients, treated with vemurafenib. The median follow-up time was 15.9 months. We evaluated progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. According to the AJCC staging system 70% of the patients had stage M1c metastasis, including 6 with stable brain metastasis. Objective responses were noted in 51.1%, the disease control rate was achieved in 79% of the patients. Complete responses were attained by 5 patients (11.6%). Median PFS was 6.48 (95% CI:4.8-15.0) months, median OS was 11.47 (95% CI:8.08-NA) months. We found significant association between LDH level and OS in univariate (p = 0.000613) and multivariate analysis (p = 0.0168). The most common adverse events (AEs) included follicular hyperkeratosis, rash, arthralgia and photosensitivity. Grade 3 AEs, such as cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, QTcB interval prolongation, rash, arthralgia were reported in 7 patients (17%). We had no Grade 4 side effects. Similar to the previously published data our analysis confirms the improved survival with vemurafenib treatment (11.47 months) in patients with BRAF V600 mutation. Vemurafenib therapy was well tolerated, the AE profile was almost consistent with the previously reported data of randomised clinical trials.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafRetrospective StudiesBRAF protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafVemurafenibLDH levelMelanomaSurvivalTargeted therapyTreatmentVemurafenib

Identifiers

PMID28963614
OpenAlexW2757079868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.