Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28963589›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2018

Influence of pre-irradiation time employed in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with diode laser.

Ana Caroline Fumes, Priscilla Coutinho Romualdo, Rachel Maciel Monteiro, Evandro Watanabe, Silmara Aparecida Milori Corona, Maria Cristina Borsatto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Management ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  10. [Edta concentration in the effectiveness of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with curcumin onRevista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Caroline FumesDepartment of Pediatric Clinics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. carolfumes02@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8255-5813
Priscilla Coutinho RomualdoDepartment of Pediatric Clinics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Rachel Maciel MonteiroDepartment of Fundamental Nursing, The College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Evandro WatanabeDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Silmara Aparecida Milori CoronaDepartment of Pediatric Clinics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Maria Cristina BorsattoDepartment of Pediatric Clinics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate, in vitro, the effect of different pre-irradiation times of the photosensitizer in photodynamic therapy in biofilms formed by Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans, through the evaluation of the microbial load. The factors under study were as follows: times of pre-irradiation of the photosensitizer in three levels (1, 2, or 5 min). For the control of the cariogenic dental biofilm with antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT), methylene blue (0.01%) was used in association with the diode laser (InGaAlP) with a wavelength of 660 nm. Chlorhexidine digluconate (0.12% CHX) and saline were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The study design was carried out in complete and randomized blocks. The sample consisted of 15 S. mutans biofilms cultures, randomly divided into five groups and 15 C. albicans cultures, also divided into five groups. The experiment was performed in triplicate (n = 3) and the response variables were obtained through quantitative analysis of bacterial viability, expressed in colony-forming units (CFU) per square millimeter of the specimen area. The data were analyzed with the aid of the ANOVA one-way test and Tukey's post-test. All analyses were performed using the Graph Pad Prism 4.0 program, with a significance level of 5%. For the S. mutans group, only the saline solution presented a statistically significant difference when compared to the other treatments (p < 0.05), that is, the treatment with aPDT, irrespective of the irradiation time applied, was similar to the treatment with CHX and both were more effective in reducing cariogenic biofilm compared to saline. For the group of C. albicans, there was no statistical difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that the treatment with aPDT reduced the number of CFUs of S. mutans in a similar way to CHX, independently of the pre-irradiation time applied. No effect of this therapy or of the different pre-irradiation times on the C. albicans biofilm could be observed. In this way, the pre-irradiation time of 1 min can be used to reduce the microbial load of S. mutans.

Indexed as

Lasers, SemiconductorPhotochemotherapyAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCandida albicansChlorhexidineColony Count, MicrobialHumansMethylene BlueMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilityPhotosensitizing AgentsStreptococcus mutansTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChlorhexidinechlorhexidine gluconateMethylene BluePhotosensitizing AgentsCandida albicansDental biofilmPhotodynamic therapyStreptococcus mutans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.