ReviewFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2017
Musings on mechanism: quest for a quark theory of proteins?
Review in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metareview: a survey of active matter reviews.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2025Review
- Seeing with an extra sense.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
- Estimating computational limits on theoretical descriptions of biological cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- "Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful"-a cross-disciplinary agenda for building useful models in cell biology and biophysics.Biophysical reviews · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The give and take between biology and physics is an important part of the history of modern science, with this partnership perhaps now more intimate than ever. In this essay, I explore the ways in which these different fields can strengthen each other through their distinct outlooks on some of the most important questions being asked about the living world. In particular, I highlight three areas where the perspective from physics might lead to deeper insights into the workings of cells. First, I consider what it means for two ostensibly unrelated problems to be the same, and how such sameness can provide unexpected insights into apparently unrelated phenomena. Second, I consider different conceptions of what constitutes a mechanistic understanding of a given phenomenon with an emphasis on nonmolecular notions of mechanism. The third idea is the importance of "toy problems" as a way of providing foundational insights into the real problems. Though my focus here is primarily on ways in which physics approaches might prove interesting in biology, I close with an example of how biology might substantially alter physics by providing a forum and the tools to uncover a fundamental understanding of nonequilibrium phenomena.-Phillips, R. Musings on mechanism: quest for a quark theory of proteins?
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.