Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28963282›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

The potential clinical benefits of medicines optimisation through comprehensive geriatric assessment, carried out by secondary care geriatricians, in a general practice care setting in North Staffordshire, UK: a feasibility study.

Simon Christian Lea, Keira Louise Watts, Nathan Ashley Davis, Barnabas Panayiotou, Michael John Bankart, Amit Arora, Ruth Chambers

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simon Christian LeaDepartment of Research and Development, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Keira Louise WattsDepartment of Research and Development, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Nathan Ashley DavisDepartment of Research and Development, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Barnabas PanayiotouPrimary Care, Stoke-on-Trent Clinical Commissioning Group, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Michael John BankartDepartment of Biostatistics, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Amit AroraDepartment of Elderly Care, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Ruth ChambersPrimary Care, Stoke-on-Trent Clinical Commissioning Group, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust · GBKeele University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the feasibility and potential clinical benefits of medicines optimisation through comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) of frail patients with multiple conditions, by secondary care geriatricians in a general practice care setting.

methodsSeven general practitioner (GP) practices in one region of Stoke-on-Trent volunteered to take part. GPs selected patients (n=186) who were local permanent residents, at least 65 years old and on eight or more medications per day. Patients were sent a written invitation outlining the assessment purpose/format. Prior to patient assessments, primary care staff prepared packs detailing patient medical history, recent consultations, current medications, recent laboratory tests and social circumstances. One hour was allocated for the CGA per patient, with one of three geriatricians, to enable sufficient time to explore all relevant aspects. Assessment comprised a full history, thorough clinical examination, assessment of balance and mobility, mental function and information on home environment and support arrangements. After consultation, geriatricians made recommendations regarding further assessments, investigations or medication changes. Geriatricians entered their main findings and recommendations onto a standard template.

resultsIn total, 687 recommendations for changes in patients' medication regimens were made for 169 (91%) patients. In 17 (9%) patients there was no recommendation to alter medications. This resulted in an average of four alterations in medication per patient. The predominant changes to medications were to stop medications (34%) or to reduce the dosage (24%). Starting a new medication represented 18% of all the medication changes. Adherence rates to geriatrician medication recommendations were 72% at 6 months and 65% at 12 months.

conclusionsCGA of older patients with complex needs, by geriatricians in a general practice care setting, is feasible. Our study demonstrated constructive collaboration between GPs and geriatricians from secondary care, suggesting further studies and clinical trials are feasible and have scope to yield beneficial outcomes.

Indexed as

PolypharmacyAgedAged, 80 and overEnglandFeasibility StudiesFemaleFrail ElderlyGeneral PracticeGeriatric AssessmentGeriatricsHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMedication Therapy ManagementSecondary Health Carecomprehensive geriatric assessmentgeriatricianmedicines optimisationmulti-morbiditypolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID28963282
PMCPMC5640128
OpenAlexW2757741773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.