Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28963058›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience letters2019

New tools for understanding coping and resilience.

Michael V Baratta, Steven F Maier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Resilience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Influence of gut microbiota on resilience and its possible mechanisms.International journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Burnout syndrome in primary and secondary school teachers in southern Brazil.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael V BarattaDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA. Electronic address: michael.baratta@colorado.edu.
Steven F MaierDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.

Funding

Stressor Controllability: The Role of the mPFC in Producing ResiliencyR01MH050479 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI MICHAEL V BARATTA, STEVEN F MAIER · 1993 to 2026
$7.9M
Embedded Prefrontal Circuits in Stress ResilienceR21MH106817 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BARATTA, MICHAEL V, MAIER, STEVEN F · 2015 to 2016
$419k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH050479NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH106817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In humans, many of the factors determining vulnerability and resilience to the impact of an adverse event revolve around coping factors. This mini-review focuses on the neural mechanisms by which coping reduces the impact of adverse events, as studied in an animal model, and discusses some of the challenges of linking neural circuit activity with stressor outcome. We highlight several approaches for probing circuit function with cell-type and pathway-specificity that overcome some of the limitations of traditional neuroscience techniques and will likely yield a more detailed and comprehensive understanding of how the brain regulates stress-responsive structures when coping behaviors are engaged.

Indexed as

Resilience, PsychologicalAdaptation, PsychologicalAnimalsBrainCognitive NeuroscienceHumansModels, AnimalNeural PathwaysPrefrontal CortexStress, PsychologicalAnxietyMedial Prefrontal CortexResilienceSerotoninStress

Identifiers

PMID28963058
PMCPMC5871534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.