Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28962627›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2017

Laboratory-acquired infections of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi in South Africa: phenotypic and genotypic analysis of isolates.

Anthony Marius Smith, Shannon Lucrecia Smouse, Nomsa Pauline Tau, Colleen Bamford, Vineshree Mischka Moodley, Charlene Jacobs, Kerrigan Mary McCarthy, Adré Lourens, Karen Helena Keddy, GERMS-SA Surveillance Network

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Unravelling the Persistence of the Rare SerovarPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Whole-genome sequencing for surveillance ofAfrican journal of laboratory medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Outbreak ofFoodborne pathogens and disease · 2019
    Article
  10. Incidence and Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anthony Marius SmithCentre for Enteric Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, National Health Laboratory Service, Private Bag X4, Sandringham, Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2131, South Africa. anthonys@nicd.ac.za.
Shannon Lucrecia SmouseCentre for Enteric Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, National Health Laboratory Service, Private Bag X4, Sandringham, Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2131, South Africa.
Nomsa Pauline TauCentre for Enteric Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, National Health Laboratory Service, Private Bag X4, Sandringham, Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2131, South Africa.
Colleen BamfordNational Health Laboratory Service (Groote Schuur Hospital), Cape Town, South Africa.
Vineshree Mischka MoodleyAMPATH Laboratories, Cape Town, South Africa.
Charlene JacobsDepartment of Health, Communicable Disease Control, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kerrigan Mary McCarthyDivision of Public Health Surveillance and Response, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Adré LourensNational Health Laboratory Service (Tygerberg Hospital), Cape Town, South Africa.
Karen Helena KeddyCentre for Enteric Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, National Health Laboratory Service, Private Bag X4, Sandringham, Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2131, South Africa.
GERMS-SA Surveillance Network
National Health Laboratory Service · ZAWestern Cape Department of Health · ZA

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U19 GH000571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorkers in clinical microbiology laboratories are exposed to a variety of pathogenic microorganisms. Salmonella species is among the most commonly reported bacterial causes of laboratory-acquired infections. We report on three cases of laboratory-acquired Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi (Salmonella Typhi) infection which occurred over the period 2012 to 2016 in South Africa.

methodsLaboratory investigation included phenotypic and genotypic characterization of isolates. Phenotypic analysis included standard microbiological identification techniques, serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Genotypic analysis included the molecular subtyping methodologies of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis, multilocus sequence typing and whole-genome sequencing (WGS); with WGS data analysis including phylogenetic analysis based upon comparison of single nucleotide polymorphism profiles of isolates.

resultsAll cases of laboratory-acquired infection were most likely the result of lapses in good laboratory practice and laboratory safety. The following critical issues were highlighted. There was misdiagnosis and misreporting of Salmonella Typhi as nontyphoidal Salmonella by a diagnostic laboratory, with associated public health implications. We highlight issues concerning the importance of accurate fluoroquinolone susceptibility testing and interpretation of results according to updated guidelines. We describe potential shortcomings of a single disk susceptibility screening test for fluoroquinolone susceptibility and suggest that confirmatory minimum inhibitory concentration testing should always be performed in cases of invasive Salmonella infections. These antimicrobial susceptibility testing issues resulted in inappropriate ciprofloxacin therapy which may have been responsible for failure in clearance of pathogen from patients. Salmonella Typhi capsular polysaccharide vaccine was not protective in one case, possibly secondarily to a faulty vaccine.

conclusionsMolecular subtyping of isolates proved effective to investigate the genetic relatedness of isolates. Molecular subtyping data interpreted together with epidemiological data allowed us to pinpoint the most likely sources for our cases of laboratory-acquired infection.

Indexed as

LaboratoriesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldFluoroquinolonesGenome, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMultilocus Sequence TypingOccupational ExposurePhylogenySalmonella typhiSouth AfricaTyphoid FeverAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinFluoroquinolonesGenotypingLaboratory-acquired infectionMLSTMolecular subtypingPFGESalmonella TyphiSouth AfricaWGSWhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID28962627
PMCPMC5622435
OpenAlexW2759235491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.