Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28962580›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2017

Citizen science applied to building healthier community environments: advancing the field through shared construct and measurement development.

Erica Hinckson, Margaret Schneider, Sandra J Winter, Emily Stone, Milo Puhan, Afroditi Stathi, Michelle M Porter, Paul A Gardiner, Daniela Lopes Dos Santos, Andrea Wolff and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Implementation of Change Club action plans to promote built environment change in rural communities.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Urban Care for Unpaid Caregivers: Community Voices in the Care Block Program, in Bogotá, Colombia.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Erica HincksonAuckland University of Technology, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, National Institute of Public and Mental Health, Centre for Child Health Research Centre for Active Ageing, Private Bag, 92006, Auckland, New Zealand. erica.hinckson@aut.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0003-3928-7830
Margaret SchneiderDepartment of Planning, Policy and Design, School of Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Sandra J WinterStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Emily StoneUniversity of Zurich, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Zurich, Switzerland.
Milo PuhanUniversity of Zurich, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Zurich, Switzerland.
Afroditi StathiUniversity of Bath, Bath, UK.
Michelle M PorterUniversity of Manitoba, Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, Centre on Aging, Winnipeg, Canada.
Paul A GardinerThe University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Australia.
Daniela Lopes Dos SantosFederal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Andrea WolffFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen, Institute of Sport Science and Sport (ISS), Nuremberg, Germany.
Abby C KingStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Training CoreU54EB020405 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2014 to 2018
$11.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical inactivity across the lifespan remains a public health issue for many developed countries. Inactivity has contributed considerably to the pervasiveness of lifestyle diseases. Government, national and local agencies and organizations have been unable to systematically, and in a coordinated way, translate behavioral research into practice that makes a difference at a population level. One approach for mobilizing multi-level efforts to improve the environment for physical activity is to engage in a process of citizen science. Citizen Science here is defined as a participatory research approach involving members of the public working closely with research investigators to initiate and advance scientific research projects. However, there are no common measures or protocols to guide citizen science research at the local community setting.

objectivesWe describe overarching categories of constructs that can be considered when designing citizen science projects expected to yield multi-level interventions, and provide an example of the citizen science approach to promoting PA. We also recommend potential measures across different levels of impact. DISCUSSION: Encouraging some consistency in measurement across studies will potentially accelerate the efficiency with which citizen science participatory research provides new insights into and solutions to the behaviorally-based public health issues that drive most of morbidity and mortality. The measures described in this paper abide by four fundamental principles specifically selected for inclusion in citizen science projects: feasibility, accuracy, propriety, and utility. The choice of measures will take into account the potential resources available for outcome and process evaluation. Our intent is to emphasize the importance for all citizen science participatory projects to follow an evidence-based approach and ensure that they incorporate an appropriate assessment protocol.

conclusionsWe provided the rationale for and a list of contextual factors along with specific examples of measures to encourage consistency among studies that plan to use a citizen science participatory approach. The potential of this approach to promote health and wellbeing in communities is high and we hope that we have provided the tools needed to optimally promote synergistic gains in knowledge across a range of Citizen Science participatory projects.

Indexed as

EnvironmentExerciseResearch DesignCommunity ParticipationHealth PromotionHumansPublic HealthResearchSocial PlanningCommunityConstructsMeasuresOur voiceResidentsStanford healthy neighborhood discovery tool

Identifiers

PMID28962580
PMCPMC5622546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.