Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28962565›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2017

A novel data-driven workflow combining literature and electronic health records to estimate comorbidities burden for a specific disease: a case study on autoimmune comorbidities in patients with celiac disease.

Jean-Baptiste Escudié, Bastien Rance, Georgia Malamut, Sherine Khater, Anita Burgun, Christophe Cellier, Anne-Sophie Jannot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Efficient extraction of medication information from clinical notes: an evaluation in 2 languages.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Lost in Translation: Diagnosis Records Show More Inaccuracies After Biopsy in Oncology Care EHRs.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Electronic Medical Records Enable Precision Medicine Approaches for Celiac Disease.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2018
    Article
  18. Biopsy Records Do Not Reduce Diagnosis Variability in Cancer Patient EHRs: Are We More Uncertain After Knowing?AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jean-Baptiste EscudiéGeorges Pompidou European Hospital (HEGP), AP-HP, Paris, France. jean-baptiste.escudie@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5398-4195
Bastien RanceGeorges Pompidou European Hospital (HEGP), AP-HP, Paris, France.
Georgia MalamutGeorges Pompidou European Hospital (HEGP), AP-HP, Paris, France.
Sherine KhaterGeorges Pompidou European Hospital (HEGP), AP-HP, Paris, France.
Anita BurgunGeorges Pompidou European Hospital (HEGP), AP-HP, Paris, France.
Christophe CellierGeorges Pompidou European Hospital (HEGP), AP-HP, Paris, France.
Anne-Sophie JannotGeorges Pompidou European Hospital (HEGP), AP-HP, Paris, France.
Délégation Paris 5 · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData collected in EHRs have been widely used to identifying specific conditions; however there is still a need for methods to define comorbidities and sources to identify comorbidities burden. We propose an approach to assess comorbidities burden for a specific disease using the literature and EHR data sources in the case of autoimmune diseases in celiac disease (CD).

methodsWe generated a restricted set of comorbidities using the literature (via the MeSH® co-occurrence file). We extracted the 15 most co-occurring autoimmune diseases of the CD. We used mappings of the comorbidities to EHR terminologies: ICD-10 (billing codes), ATC (drugs) and UMLS (clinical reports). Finally, we extracted the concepts from the different data sources. We evaluated our approach using the correlation between prevalence estimates in our cohort and co-occurrence ranking in the literature.

resultsWe retrieved the comorbidities for 741 patients with CD. 18.1% of patients had at least one of the 15 studied autoimmune disorders. Overall, 79.3% of the mapped concepts were detected only in text, 5.3% only in ICD codes and/or drugs prescriptions, and 15.4% could be found in both sources. Prevalence in our cohort were correlated with literature (Spearman's coefficient 0.789, p = 0.0005). The three most prevalent comorbidities were thyroiditis 12.6% (95% CI 10.1-14.9), type 1 diabetes 2.3% (95% CI 1.2-3.4) and dermatitis herpetiformis 2.0% (95% CI 1.0-3.0).

conclusionWe introduced a process that leveraged the MeSH terminology to identify relevant autoimmune comorbidities of the CD and several data sources from EHRs to phenotype a large population of CD patients. We achieved prevalence estimates comparable to the literature.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsAdultAutoimmune DiseasesCeliac DiseaseComorbidityCost of IllnessData MiningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeWorkflowAddison diseaseAntiphospholipid syndromeArthritis, juvenileArthritis, rheumatoidAutoimmune diseasesCeliac diseaseDermatitis herpetiformisDiabetes mellitus, type 1Electronic health recordsGraves’ diseaseHepatitis, autoimmuneIcd 10Lupus erythematosus, systemicMultiple sclerosisMyasthenia gravisPhenotypePolyendocrinopathies, autoimmunePrevalence studySjogren’s syndromeThyroiditis, autoimmune

Identifiers

PMID28962565
PMCPMC5622531
OpenAlexW2758723248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.