ArticleToxicology reports2014
Toxicity prediction from toxicogenomic data based on class association rule mining.
Article in Toxicology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning on Toxicogenomic Data Reveals a Strong Association Between the Induction of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Centrilobular Hepatocyte Hypertrophy in Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The Eco-Exposome Concept: Supporting an Integrated Assessment of Mixtures of Environmental Chemicals.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2022Article
- Transcriptomics in Toxicogenomics, Part III: Data Modelling for Risk Assessment.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Models of germ cell development and their application for toxicity studies.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While the recent advent of new technologies in biology such as DNA microarray and next-generation sequencer has given researchers a large volume of data representing genome-wide biological responses, it is not necessarily easy to derive knowledge that is accurate and understandable at the same time. In this study, we applied the Classification Based on Association (CBA) algorithm, one of the class association rule mining techniques, to the TG-GATEs database, where both toxicogenomic and toxicological data of more than 150 compounds in rat and human are stored. We compared the generated classifiers between CBA and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and showed that CBA is superior to LDA in terms of both predictive performances (accuracy: 83% for CBA vs. 75% for LDA, sensitivity: 82% for CBA vs. 72% for LDA, specificity: 85% for CBA vs. 75% for LDA) and interpretability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.