Trial reportThe American journal of surgical pathology2018
Whole Slide Imaging Versus Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology: A Multicenter Blinded Randomized Noninferiority Study of 1992 Cases (Pivotal Study).
Trial report in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 183 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
183 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 381 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines for the adoption of digital pathology in clinical pathology units recommended by the polish society of pathologists.Diagnostic pathology · 2026Guideline
- Technical and Diagnostic Issues in Whole Slide Imaging Published Validation Studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Best Practice Recommendations for the Implementation of a Digital Pathology Workflow in the Anatomic Pathology Laboratory by the European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Guideline
- Diagnostic concordance and discordance in digital pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical pathology · 2021Pooled it
- The performance of digital microscopy for primary diagnosis in human pathology: a systematic review.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2019Pooled it
- ["Digital Pathology in Diagnostics-reporting on digital images" guideline of the Professional Association of German Pathologists].Der Pathologe · 2018Guideline
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Pathology: Technological Transformation and Strategic Impact in Clinical Research and Medical Affairs.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Deployment of AI-driven automated quality control of whole-slide images in a large tertiary cancer center.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Screening efficiency over experience: Rapid target detection in low-power field as a modifiable cognitive biomarker for diagnostic accuracy in digital cytology.Cancer cytopathology · 2026Article
- Accelerating the implementation of digital pathology in India.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Dermatopathology: An Update and Review of the Current Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multimodal deep learning framework for recurrence risk stratification in soft tissue sarcoma: a multicenter study.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Standardized Instance-Level Quantification of CD34-Positive Vessels in Lymph Node Whole-Slide Images Using U-Net.Pathology international · 2026Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Breast Cancer Histopathology: Toward Improved Diagnosis and Prognosis.Cancers · 2026Review
- The evolving role of DICOM in digital pathology.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- AI caption generation model for digital pathology of adenocarcinoma in endoscopic histopathology using multi-instance attention mechanisms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Foundation Models in Cancer Pathology: Techniques, Applications, and Future Directions.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Leveraging digital pathology to enhance breast cancer diagnosis in low-resource settings: a cross-sectional study of major histopathology laboratories in Uganda.Oxford open digital health · 2026Article
- An effective study on the diagnosis of colon cancer with the developed local binary pattern method.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Roche Digital Pathology Dx whole slide imaging system is comparable to traditional microscopy for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology.American journal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
123 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
34 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most prior studies of primary diagnosis in surgical pathology using whole slide imaging (WSI) versus microscopy have focused on specific organ systems or included relatively few cases. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that WSI is noninferior to microscopy for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology. A blinded randomized noninferiority study was conducted across the entire range of surgical pathology cases (biopsies and resections, including hematoxylin and eosin, immunohistochemistry, and special stains) from 4 institutions using the original sign-out diagnosis (baseline diagnosis) as the reference standard. Cases were scanned, converted to WSI and randomized. Sixteen pathologists interpreted cases by microscopy or WSI, followed by a wash-out period of ≥4 weeks, after which cases were read by the same observers using the other modality. Major discordances were identified by an adjudication panel, and the differences between major discordance rates for both microscopy (against the reference standard) and WSI (against the reference standard) were calculated. A total of 1992 cases were included, resulting in 15,925 reads. The major discordance rate with the reference standard diagnosis was 4.9% for WSI and 4.6% for microscopy. The difference between major discordance rates for microscopy and WSI was 0.4% (95% confidence interval, -0.30% to 1.01%). The difference in major discordance rates for WSI and microscopy was highest in endocrine pathology (1.8%), neoplastic kidney pathology (1.5%), urinary bladder pathology (1.3%), and gynecologic pathology (1.2%). Detailed analysis of these cases revealed no instances where interpretation by WSI was consistently inaccurate compared with microscopy for multiple observers. We conclude that WSI is noninferior to microscopy for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology, including biopsies and resections stained with hematoxylin and eosin, immunohistochemistry and special stains. This conclusion is valid across a wide variety of organ systems and specimen types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.