Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28960878›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2017

Experiences and lessons learned for delivery of micronutrient powders interventions.

Ietje Reerink, Sorrel Ml Namaste, Alia Poonawala, Christina Nyhus Dhillon, Nancy Aburto, Deepika Chaudhery, Hou Kroeun, Marcia Griffiths, Mohammad Raisul Haque, Anabelle Bonvecchio and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 10 countries.

Ietje ReerinkIndependent Consultant, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Sorrel Ml NamasteStrengthening Partnerships, Results, and Innovations in Nutrition Globally, Arlington, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6857-8461
Alia PoonawalaGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4288-8354
Christina Nyhus DhillonIndependent Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7004-6336
Nancy AburtoWorld Food Programme, Rome, Italy.
Deepika ChaudheryMicronutrient Initiative, New Delhi, India.
Hou KroeunHelen Keller International, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Marcia GriffithsThe Manoff Group, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Mohammad Raisul HaqueBRAC, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-3684-3697
Anabelle BonvecchioInstituto Nacional de Salud Publica, Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2765-0818
Maria Elena JefferdsNutrition Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2652-4502
Rahul RawatInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Dakar, Senegal.
Helen Keller International · USBRAC · BDCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USGates Foundation · USGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition · CHInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MXMedia Working Group · USNutrition International · CAUniversity of Antananarivo · MGWorld Food Programme · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An effective delivery strategy coupled with relevant social and behaviour change communication (SBCC) have been identified as central to the implementation of micronutrient powders (MNP) interventions, but there has been limited documentation of what works. Under the auspices of "The Micronutrient Powders Consultation: Lessons Learned for Operational Guidance," three working groups were formed to summarize experiences and lessons across countries regarding MNP interventions for young children. This paper focuses on programmatic experiences related to MNP delivery (models, platforms, and channels), SBCC, and training. Methods included a review of published and grey literature, interviews with key informants, and deliberations throughout the consultation process. We found that most countries distributed MNP free of charge via the health sector, although distribution through other platforms and using subsidized fee for product or mixed payment models have also been used. Community-based distribution channels have generally shown higher coverage and when part of an infant and young child feeding approach, may provide additional benefit given their complementarity. SBCC for MNP has worked best when focused on meeting the MNP behavioural objectives (appropriate use, intake adherence, and related infant and young child feeding behaviours). Programmers have learned that reincorporating SBCC and training throughout the intervention life cycle has allowed for much needed adaptations. Diverse experiences delivering MNP exist, and although no one-size-fits-all approach emerged, well-established delivery platforms, community involvement, and SBCC-centred designs tended to have more success. Much still needs to be learned on MNP delivery, and we propose a set of implementation research questions that require further investigation.

Indexed as

Program EvaluationAnemiaAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyBehavior TherapyBreast FeedingChild, PreschoolDietary SupplementsFood AssistanceFood, FortifiedHealth EducationHealth Plan ImplementationHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMicronutrientsPovertyMicronutrientsPowdersbehaviourcommunicationcomplementary feedingiron deficiency anaemiamicronutrientsprogramming

Identifiers

PMID28960878
PMCPMC5656897
OpenAlexW2762909318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.