Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28960875›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2017

Experiences and lessons learned for planning and supply of micronutrient powders interventions.

Claudia Schauer, Nigel Sunley, Carrie Hubbell Melgarejo, Christina Nyhus Dhillon, Claudia Roca, Gustavo Tapia, Pragya Mathema, Shelley Walton, Ruth Situma, Stanley Zlotkin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Claudia SchauerCentre for Global Child Health and Home Fortification Technical Advisory Group (HF-TAG), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nigel SunleySunley Consulting, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Carrie Hubbell MelgarejoStrengthening Partnerships, Results, and Innovations in Nutrition Globally, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Christina Nyhus DhillonIndependent Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7004-6336
Claudia RocaJohn Snow, Inc., Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Gustavo TapiaIndependent Consultant, Cochabamba, Bolivia.ORCID 0000-0002-6941-7977
Pragya MathemaUNICEF, Abuja, Nigeria.
Shelley WaltonFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ruth SitumaUNICEF, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5513-9646
Stanley ZlotkinCenter for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rolf Dw KlemmHelen Keller International, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8423-1943

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Realistic planning for a nutrition intervention is a critical component of implementation, yet effective approaches have been poorly documented. Under the auspices of "The Micronutrient Powders Consultation: Lessons Learned for Operational Guidance," 3 working groups were formed to summarize experiences and lessons across countries regarding micronutrient powders (MNP) interventions for young children. This paper focuses on programmatic experiences in the planning stages of an MNP intervention, encompassing assessment, enabling environment and adaptation, as well as considerations for supply. Methods included a review of published and grey literature, key informant interviews, and deliberations throughout the consultation process. We found that assessments helped justify adopting an MNP intervention, but these assessments were often limited by their narrow scope and inadequate data. Establishing coordinating bodies and integrating MNP into existing policies and programmes have helped foster an enabling environment and support programme stability. Formative research and pilots have been used to adapt MNP interventions to specific contexts, but they have been insufficient to inform scale-up. In terms of supply, most countries have opted to procure MNP through international suppliers, but this still requires understanding and navigating the local regulatory environment at the earliest stages of an intervention. Overall, these findings indicate that although some key planning and supply activities are generally undertaken, improvements are needed to plan for effective scale-up. Much still needs to be learned on MNP planning, and we propose a set of research questions that require further investigation.

Indexed as

Health PlanningProgram EvaluationAnemiaAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyDietary SupplementsFood AssistanceFood, FortifiedHealth Plan ImplementationHealth PromotionHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMicronutrientsPovertyPowdersUnited StatesMicronutrientsPowdersassessment of nutritional statusinfant and child nutritioniron deficiency anaemiamicronutrientspolicyprogramme components

Identifiers

PMID28960875
PMCPMC5656916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.