ArticleInternational wound journal2017
The contribution of a directional preference of stiffness to the efficacy of prophylactic sacral dressings in protecting healthy and diabetic tissues from pressure injury: computational modelling studies.
Article in International wound journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Shear Force Redistribution and Microclimate in Foam Dressings Indicated for Pressure Injury Prevention.Advances in skin & wound care · 2025Article
- The frictional energy absorber effectiveness and its impact on the pressure ulcer prevention performance of multilayer dressings.International wound journal · 2024Review
- Alternatives and preferences for materials in use for pressure ulcer prevention: An experiment-reinforced literature review.International wound journal · 2022Article
- The biomechanical efficacy of a dressing with a soft cellulose fluff core in protecting prone surgical patients from chest injuries on the operating table.International wound journal · 2022Article
- Evaluation of facial tissue stresses under medical devices post application of a cyanoacrylate liquid skin protectant: An integrated experimental-computational study.International wound journal · 2022Article
- The biomechanical efficacy of a dressing with a soft cellulose fluff core in prophylactic use.International wound journal · 2020Article
- Protecting prone positioned patients from facial pressure ulcers using prophylactic dressings: A timely biomechanical analysis in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.International wound journal · 2020Article
- Critical biomechanical and clinical insights concerning tissue protection when positioning patients in the operating room: A scoping review.International wound journal · 2020Article
- An integrated experimental-computational study of the microclimate under dressings applied to intact weight-bearing skin.International wound journal · 2020Article
- How patient migration in bed affects the sacral soft tissue loading and thereby the risk for a hospital-acquired pressure injury.International wound journal · 2020Article
- Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?International wound journal · 2020Article
- Sodium pyruvate pre-treatment prevents cell death due to localised, damaging mechanical strains in the context of pressure ulcers.International wound journal · 2019Article
- Release of sodium pyruvate from sacral prophylactic dressings: A computational model.International wound journal · 2019Article
- The biomechanical protective effects of a treatment dressing on the soft tissues surrounding a non-offloaded sacral pressure ulcer.International wound journal · 2019Article
- Dressings cut to shape alleviate facial tissue loads while using an oxygen mask.International wound journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sacral region is the most common site for pressure injuries (PIs) associated with lying in bed, and such sacral PIs often commence as deep tissue injuries (DTIs) that later present as open wounds. In complex patients, diabetes is common. Because, among other factors, diabetes affects connective tissue stiffness properties, making these tissues less able to dissipate mechanical loads through physiological deformations, diabetes is an additional biomechanical risk factor for PIs and DTIs. A preventive measure with established successful clinical outcomes is the use of sacral prophylactic dressings. The objective of this study has been to expand our previous work regarding the modes of action and biomechanical efficacy of prophylactic dressings in protecting the soft tissues adjacent to the sacrum by specifically examining the role of a directional stiffness preference (anisotropy) of the dressing while further accounting for diabetic tissue conditions. Multiple three-dimensional anatomically detailed finite element (FE) model variants representing diabetic tissue conditions were used, and tissue loading state data were compared with healthy tissue simulations. We specifically compared soft tissue exposures to elevated internal shear stresses and strain energy densities (SED) near the sacrum during supine weight bearing on a standard (foam) hospital mattress without a dressing, with a prophylactic dressing lacking directional stiffness preferences and with an anisotropic dressing. Our results have clearly shown that an anisotropic dressing design reduces the peak tissue stresses and exposure to sustained tissue deformations in both healthy and diabetic cases. The present study provides additional important insights regarding the optimal structural and material design of prophylactic dressings, which in turn, informs clinicians and decision makers regarding beneficial features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.