Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28960764›Full record

SynthesisObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2017

Social marketing approaches to nutrition and physical activity interventions in early care and education centres: a systematic review.

C T Luecking, H Hennink-Kaminski, C Ihekweazu, A Vaughn, S Mazzucca, D S Ward

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. The Use of Social Marketing in Community-Wide Physical Activity Programs: A Scoping Review.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Designing an eHealth Well-Being Program: A Participatory Design Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

C T LueckingGillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
H Hennink-KaminskiSchool of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
C IhekweazuSchool of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
A VaughnCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
S MazzuccaGillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
D S WardGillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

Our Year of Healthy Living: A social marketing intervention for child care & homeR01HL120969 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WARD, DIANNE STANTON · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
ACL HHS U48DP005017NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL120969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSocial marketing is a promising planning approach for influencing voluntary lifestyle behaviours, but its application to nutrition and physical activity interventions in the early care and education setting remains unknown.

methodsPubMed, ISI Web of Science, PsycInfo and the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health were systematically searched to identify interventions targeting nutrition and/or physical activity behaviours of children enrolled in early care centres between 1994 and 2016. Content analysis methods were used to capture information reflecting eight social marketing benchmark criteria.

resultsThe review included 135 articles representing 77 interventions. Two interventions incorporated all eight benchmark criteria, but the majority included fewer than four. Each intervention included behaviour and methods mix criteria, and more than half identified audience segments. Only one-third of interventions incorporated customer orientation, theory, exchange and insight. Only six interventions addressed competing behaviours. We did not find statistical significance for the effectiveness of interventions on child-level diet, physical activity or anthropometric outcomes based on the number of benchmark criteria used.

conclusionThis review highlights opportunities to apply social marketing to obesity prevention interventions in early care centres. Social marketing could be an important strategy for early childhood obesity prevention efforts, and future research investigations into its effects are warranted.

Indexed as

DietExerciseNutrition PolicySocial MarketingBenchmarkingChild CareChild Day Care CentersChild, PreschoolHumansearly care and educationobesity prevention interventionssocial marketing

Identifiers

PMID28960764
PMCPMC5702552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.