Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28960527›Full record

Trial reportSynapse (New York, N.Y.)2018

Diffusion Entropy: A Potential Neuroimaging Biomarker of Bipolar Disorder in the Temporal Pole.

Karl Spuhler, Elizabeth Bartlett, Jie Ding, Christine DeLorenzo, Ramin Parsey, Chuan Huang

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Synapse (New York, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karl SpuhlerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook, New York 11794.
Elizabeth BartlettDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook, New York 11794.
Jie DingDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook, New York 11794.
Christine DeLorenzoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook, New York 11794.
Ramin ParseyDepartment of Psychiatry, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, New York 11794.
Chuan HuangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook, New York 11794.ORCID 0000-0001-6052-0663
Stony Brook Medicine · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

Supplement to Lithium's Molecular Mechanism of Action and the Pathology of Bipolar DisordersR01MH090276 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI PARSEY, RAMIN V. · 2011 to 2015
$4.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH090276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite much research, bipolar depression remains poorly understood, with no clinically useful biomarkers for its diagnosis. The paralimbic system has become a target for biomarker research, with paralimbic structural connectivity commonly reported to distinguish bipolar patients from controls in tractography-based diffusion MRI studies, despite inconsistent findings in voxel-based studies. The purpose of this analysis was to validate existing findings with traditional diffusion MRI metrics and investigate the utility of a novel diffusion MRI metric, entropy of diffusion, in the search for bipolar depression biomarkers. We performed group-level analysis on 9 un-medicated (6 medication-naïve; 3 medication-free for at least 33 days) bipolar patients in a major depressive episode and 9 matched healthy controls to compare: (1) average mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) and; (2) MD and FA histogram entropy-a statistical measure of distribution homogeneity-in the amygdala, hippocampus, orbitofrontal cortex and temporal pole. We also conducted classification analyses with leave-one-out and separate testing dataset (N = 11) approaches. We did not observe statistically significant differences in average MD or FA between the groups in any region. However, in the temporal pole, we observed significantly lower MD entropy in bipolar patients; this finding suggests a regional difference in MD distributions in the absence of an average difference. This metric allowed us to accurately characterize bipolar patients from controls in leave-one-out (accuracy = 83%) and prediction (accuracy = 73%) analyses. This novel application of diffusion MRI yielded not only an interesting separation between bipolar patients and healthy controls, but also accurately classified bipolar patients from controls.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultArea Under CurveBipolar DisorderBrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingEntropyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveYoung Adultbipolar depressiondiffusiondiffusion MRItemporal pole

Identifiers

PMID28960527
PMCPMC5823690
OpenAlexW2758047571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.