Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28960120›Full record

ArticleNucleus (Austin, Tex.)2017

Defining the epichromatin epitope.

Travis J Gould, Katalin Tóth, Norbert Mücke, Jörg Langowski, Alexandra S Hakusui, Ada L Olins, Donald E Olins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. High-Resolution Cryo-EM Analyses of Nucleosomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Hyperosmotic stress:Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Travis J Goulda Department of Physics & Astronomy , Bates College , Lewiston , ME , USA.
Katalin Tóthb Division of Biophysics of Macromolecules, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) , Heidelberg , Germany.
Norbert Mückeb Division of Biophysics of Macromolecules, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) , Heidelberg , Germany.
Jörg Langowskib Division of Biophysics of Macromolecules, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) , Heidelberg , Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8600-0666
Alexandra S Hakusuia Department of Physics & Astronomy , Bates College , Lewiston , ME , USA.
Ada L Olinsc Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences , College of Pharmacy, University of New England , Portland , ME , USA.
Donald E Olinsc Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences , College of Pharmacy, University of New England , Portland , ME , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6088-0842
German Cancer Research Center · DEBates College · USNew England College · US

Funding

The Maine Biomedical Research Network (INBRE)P20GM103423 · NIGMS · MOUNT DESERT ISLAND BIOLOGICAL LAB · PI Dustin Lynn Updike · 2012 to 2026
$60.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epichromatin is identified by immunostaining fixed and permeabilized cells with particular bivalent anti-nucleosome antibodies (mAbs PL2-6 and 1H6). During interphase, epichromatin resides adjacent to the inner nuclear membrane; during mitosis, at the outer surface of mitotic chromosomes. By STED (stimulated emission depletion) microscopy, PL2-6 stained interphase epichromatin is ∼76 nm thick and quite uniform; mitotic epichromatin is more variable in thickness, exhibiting a "wrinkled" surface with an average thickness of ∼78 nm. Co-immunostaining with anti-Ki-67 demonstrates Ki-67 deposition between the PL2-6 "ridges" of mitotic epichromatin. Monovalent papain-derived Fab fragments of PL2-6 yield a strikingly different punctate "chromomeric" immunostaining pattern throughout interphase nuclei and along mitotic chromosome arms. Evidence from electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and from analytical ultracentrifugation characterize the Fab/mononucleosome complex, supporting the concept that there are two binding sites per nucleosome. The peptide sequence of the Hv3 region (heavy chain variable region 3) of the PL2-6 antibody binding site strongly resembles other nucleosome acidic patch binding proteins (especially, LANA and CENPC), supporting that the nucleosome acidic patch is included within the epichromatin epitope. It is speculated that the interphase epichromatin epitope is "exposed" with favorable geometric arrangements for binding bivalent PL2-6 at the surface chromatin; whereas, the epitope is "hidden" within internal chromatin. Furthermore, it is suggested that the "exposed" nucleosome surface of mitotic epichromatin may play a role in post-mitotic nuclear envelope reformation.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceCell LineChromatinChromosomes, HumanEpitopesHumansInterphaseModels, MolecularNucleosomesPeptidesChromatinEpitopesNucleosomesPeptidesacidic patchbivalent antibodychromomereconfocalLANA (latency-associated nuclear antigen from Karposi's Sarcoma Herpesvirus)monovalent fab fragmentnucleosomeSTED

Identifiers

PMID28960120
PMCPMC5788559
OpenAlexW2759782725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.