Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28960033›Full record

Trial reportJournal of Korean medical science2017

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DA-9601 versus Its New Formulation, DA-5204, in Patients with Gastritis: Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Study.

Yoon Jin Choi, Dong Ho Lee, Myung Gyu Choi, Sung Joon Lee, Sung Kook Kim, Geun Am Song, Poong Lyul Rhee, Hwoon Yong Jung, Dae Hwan Kang, Yong Chan Lee and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of Korean medical science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02282670 (A Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of DA-5204 and to Demonstrate the Non-inferiority of DA-5204 Compared With Stillen Tab. in Patients With Acute or Chronic Gastritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02282670 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

A Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of DA-5204 and to Demonstrate the Non-inferiority of DA-5204 Compared With Stillen Tab. in Patients With Acute or Chronic Gastritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorDong-A ST Co., Ltd.Ran2014 to 2014Enrolled434ConditionsAcute Gastritis, Chronic GastritisArmsDA-5204, Stillen tab.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of StillenJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 19 institutions in 1 country.

Yoon Jin ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1922-9388
Dong Ho LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea. dhljohn@yahoo.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6376-410X
Myung Gyu ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4083-5187
Sung Joon LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6451-0400
Sung Kook KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2861-8123
Geun Am SongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2100-8522
Poong Lyul RheeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0495-5296
Hwoon Yong JungDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1281-5859
Dae Hwan KangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Yong Chan LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8800-6906
Si Hyung LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7221-7506
Suck Chei ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1338-3306
Ki Nam ShimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4004-6292
Sang Yong SeolDepartment of Internal Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Jeong Seop MoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5909-8159
Yong Woon ShinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7876-6178
Hyun Soo KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4834-0496
Soo Teik LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2975-053X
Jin Woong ChoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0296-8045
Eun Kwang ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6376-1849
Oh Young LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6025-530X
Jin Seok JangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Kangwon National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRCatholic University of Korea · KRChonnam National University · KRDong-A University · KREwha Womans University · KRHanyang University · KRInha University · KRInje University Busan Paik Hospital · KRInje University Seoul Paik Hospital · KRJeju National University Hospital · KRKyungpook National University · KRPresbyterian Medical Center · KRPusan National University · KRPusan National University Yangsan Hospital · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRUlsan College · KRWonkwang University · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the efficacy of DA-9601 (Dong-A ST Co., Seoul, Korea) and its new formulation, DA-5204 (Dong-A ST Co.), for treating erosive gastritis. This phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, non-inferiority trial randomly assigned 434 patients with endoscopically proven gastric mucosal erosions into two groups: DA-9601 3 times daily or DA-5,204 twice daily for 2 weeks. The final analysis included 421 patients (DA-5204, 209; DA-9601, 212). The primary endpoint (rate of effective gastric erosion healing) and secondary endpoints (cure rate of endoscopic erosion and gastrointestinal [GI] symptom relief) were assessed using endoscopy after the treatment. Drug-related adverse events (AEs), including GI symptoms, were also compared. At week 2, gastric healing rates with DA-5204 and DA-9601 were 42.1% (88/209) and 42.5% (90/212), respectively. The difference between the groups was -0.4% (95% confidence interval, -9.8% to 9.1%), which was above the non-inferiority margin of -14%. The cure rate of gastric erosion in both groups was 37.3%. The improvement rates of GI symptoms with DA-5204 and DA-9601 were 40.4% and 40.8%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in both secondary endpoints. AEs were reported in 18 (8.4%) patients in the DA-5204 group and 19 (8.8%) in the DA-9601 group. Rates of AE were not different between the two groups. No serious AE or adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurred. These results demonstrate the non-inferiority of DA-5204 compared to DA-9601. DA-5204 is as effective as DA-9601 in the treatment of erosive gastritis. Registered randomized clinical trial at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02282670).

Indexed as

AdultDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGastric MucosaGastritisGastrointestinal DiseasesGastroscopyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlant ExtractsTreatment OutcomeDA 9601Plant ExtractsAdverse Drug EventArtemisiaDouble-blind StudyEndoscopyGastritis

Identifiers

PMID28960033
PMCPMC5639061
OpenAlexW2756548641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.