Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28960025›Full record

ReviewJournal of Korean medical science2017

Researcher and Author Profiles: Opportunities, Advantages, and Limitations.

Armen Yuri Gasparyan, Bekaidar Nurmashev, Marlen Yessirkepov, Dmitry A Endovitskiy, Alexander A Voronov, George D Kitas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Korean medical science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future.British journal of biomedical science · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Predatory Journals and Publishers - Dilemmas: How to Assess it and How to Avoid it?Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2021
    Article
  7. Peer Reviewers in Central Asia: Publons Based Analysis.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. SPI-Hub™: a gateway to scholarly publishing information.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Steps towards quality of open access publishing.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Inappropriate Authorship and Kinship in Research Evaluation.Journal of Korean medical science · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Armen Yuri GasparyanDepartments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching Trust of the University of Birmingham, UK), Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK. a.gasparyan@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8749-6018
Bekaidar NurmashevSouth Kazakhstan State Pharmaceutical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3949-2543
Marlen YessirkepovDepartment of Biochemistry, Biology and Microbiology, South Kazakhstan State Pharmaceutical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2511-6918
Dmitry A EndovitskiyVoronezh State University, Voronezh, Russian Federation.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0030-0252
Alexander A VoronovDepartment of Marketing and Trade Deals, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russian Federation.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8505-7345
George D KitasDepartments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching Trust of the University of Birmingham, UK), Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0828-6176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently available online profiling platforms offer various services for researchers and authors. Opening an individual account and filling it with scholarly contents increase visibility of research output and boost its impact. This article overviews some of the widely used and emerging profiling platforms, highlighting their tools for sharing scholarly items, crediting individuals, and facilitating networking. Global bibliographic databases and search platforms, such as Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar, are widely used for profiling authors with indexed publications. Scholarly networking websites, such as ResearchGate and Academia.edu, provide indispensable services for researchers poorly visible elsewhere on the Internet. Several specialized platforms are designed to offer profiling along with their main functionalities, such as reference management and archiving. The Open Researcher and Contributor Identification (ORCID) project has offered a solution to the author name disambiguation. It has been integrated with numerous bibliographic databases, platforms, and manuscript submission systems to help research managers and journal editors select and credit the best reviewers, and other scholarly contributors. Individuals with verifiable reviewer and editorial accomplishments are also covered by Publons, which is an increasingly recognized service for publicizing and awarding reviewer comments. Currently available profiling formats have numerous advantages and some limitations. The advantages are related to their openness and chances of boosting the researcher impact. Some of the profiling websites are complementary to each other. The underutilization of various profiling websites and their inappropriate uses for promotion of 'predatory' journals are among reported limitations. A combined approach to the profiling systems is advocated in this article.

Indexed as

Databases, BibliographicResearch PersonnelDatabases, FactualInformation Storage and RetrievalPublishingAuthorBibliography as TopicInformation RetrievalPerformanceProfileResearcherScholarly Journal

Identifiers

PMID28960025
PMCPMC5639053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.