Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28959922›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of STD & AIDS2018

Acceptability and feasibility of self-sampling for the screening of sexually transmitted infections in cabana privacy shelters.

Ellen Pittman, Hillary Purcell, Laura Dize, Charlotte Gaydos, Sherine Patterson-Rose, Frank Biro, DeAnna Owens, Lea E Widdice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of STD & AIDS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ellen Pittman1 Division of Adolescent and Transition Medicine, 2518 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Hillary Purcell1 Division of Adolescent and Transition Medicine, 2518 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Laura Dize2 Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Sexually Transmitted Infections Research Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Charlotte Gaydos2 Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Sexually Transmitted Infections Research Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sherine Patterson-Rose1 Division of Adolescent and Transition Medicine, 2518 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Frank Biro1 Division of Adolescent and Transition Medicine, 2518 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, OH, USA.
DeAnna Owens1 Division of Adolescent and Transition Medicine, 2518 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Lea E Widdice1 Division of Adolescent and Transition Medicine, 2518 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MEINZEN-DERR, JAREEN, STRAWN, JEFFREY ROBERT · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
TrainingU54EB007958 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Yukari C Manabe, Susan Anne Tuddenham · 2007 to 2026
$34.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB007958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) outside of traditional health-care facilities is limited by the privacy needed for sample collection. We explored the acceptability of privacy shelters for the self-collection of genital swabs and tested the use of privacy shelters during mobile STI screening. Attendees ≥14 years old at two outdoor community events completed a questionnaire that assessed participant characteristics, health-care access, and rating of acceptability of self-collecting penile or vaginal swabs in a privacy shelter and four other private spaces: portable restroom, health van, home, and doctor's office. A privacy shelter was used during mobile STI screening. The majority (65%) of the 95 participants reported that using a privacy shelter was somewhat or very acceptable. No participant characteristics or health-care access factors were associated with the acceptability of privacy shelters. Women rated a privacy shelter more acceptable than a portable restroom or health van. Men rated a privacy shelter more acceptable than a portable restroom. During mobile STI screening, all 13 men and women who requested STI testing used the privacy shelter for self-sampling. Rating of acceptability before and after privacy shelter use was the same. Privacy shelters may enable STI screening without using a building or vehicle for sample collection.

Indexed as

Mobile Health UnitsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrivacyAdolescentAdultChlamydia InfectionsCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleGonorrheaHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOhioPoint-of-Care SystemsChlamydiadiagnosisgonorrhoeamenmobile health unitspoint of carescreeningsexually transmitted infectionsspecimen handlingwomen

Identifiers

PMID28959922
PMCPMC6055996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.