Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28959640›Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2017

Experimental study and mathematical modeling of toxic metals combined action as a scientific foundation for occupational and environmental health risk assessment. A summary of results obtained by the Ekaterinburg research team (Russia).

Ilzira A Minigalieva, Boris A Katsnelson, Vladimir G Panov, Anatoly N Varaksin, Vladimir B Gurvich, Larisa I Privalova, Marina P Sutunkova, Svetlana V Klinova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparative and CombinedDose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ilzira A MinigalievaThe Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, Ekaterinburg, 620014, Russia.
Boris A KatsnelsonThe Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, Ekaterinburg, 620014, Russia.
Vladimir G PanovInstitute of Industrial Ecology, the Urals Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
Anatoly N VaraksinInstitute of Industrial Ecology, the Urals Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
Vladimir B GurvichThe Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, Ekaterinburg, 620014, Russia.
Larisa I PrivalovaThe Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, Ekaterinburg, 620014, Russia.
Marina P SutunkovaThe Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, Ekaterinburg, 620014, Russia.
Svetlana V KlinovaThe Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, Ekaterinburg, 620014, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of cumulative health risks associated with the widely observed combined effects of two or more metals and their compounds on the organism has the toxicology of mixtures as its scientific basis although there is no full match between such assessment and this basis while some of the contradictions between them are of a fundamental nature. This state of things may be explained not only by simplifications characteristic of the generally recognized methodology of risk assessment but also by extreme complexity of the theory of combined toxicity, the most essential issues of which are considered by authors on the basis of literary and, mostly, their own previously published data.

Indexed as

Health risk assessmentMathematical modelingToxic metalsTypology of combined toxicity

Identifiers

PMID28959640
PMCPMC5615118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.