ArticleCureus2017
Perceptions of Community Risk and Travel During Pregnancy in an Area of Zika Transmission.
Article in Cureus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human mobility and the infectious disease transmission: A systematic review.Geo-spatial information science = Diqui kongjian xinxi kexue xuebao · 2024Article
- Mining and Validating Social Media Data for COVID-19-Related Human Behaviors Between January and July 2020: Infodemiology Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Methods of Tracking Newborns: New York State Zika Pregnancy and Infant Registry, 2015-2017.American journal of public health · 2020Article
- Personal protective measures of pregnant women against Zika virus infection.Revista de saude publica · 2019Article
- Identifying Protective Health Behaviors on Twitter: Observational Study of Travel Advisories and Zika Virus.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Between June 2016 and August 2016, the first cases of the Zika transmission were reported in Miami, FL, US. Since then, travel advisories have been issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to avoid travel to Florida. Women that are of childbearing age or pregnant are the populations most vulnerable to Zika infection because birth defects can occur in infants born to infected mothers. Till date, there are no studies assessing the perception of the community risk of Zika in pregnant women residing in an affected region such as Miami. Methods A cross-sectional design was utilized for this study. The survey included questions assessing community risk and travel perceptions. Surveys were distributed in the antenatal clinics at the University of Miami Hospital and the Jackson Memorial Hospital. Results A total of 85 women were surveyed between January 27, 2016 and March 3, 2017. Of the surveyed women, 92.6 percent believed Zika is an important issue in their community, 85.9 percent reported a change in behavior because of Zika, 26.9 percent believed they can get Zika at their location, and 13.9 percent considered moving away from Florida because of Zika. Conclusion Despite the majority of women believing Zika is an important issue in their community, only one-fourth believed they could get Zika in Miami. Efforts to educate pregnant women in affected areas about preventive measures against the Zika infection should be undertaken. Further studies comparing the perceptions of community risks and travel behaviors in other affected areas are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.