Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28959505›Full record

ArticleCurrent ophthalmology reports2017

Update on the Management of High-Risk Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Sayena Jabbehdari, Alireza Baradaran Rafii, Ghasem Yazdanpanah, Pedram Hamrah, Edward J Holland, Ali R Djalilian

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current ophthalmology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Etiology, surgical management, and outcomes of patients with scleral thinning.The Journal of international medical research · 2026
    Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sayena JabbehdariDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Alireza Baradaran RafiiOcular Tissue Engineering Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ghasem YazdanpanahDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Pedram HamrahDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tufts University Medical School, Boston, MA.
Edward J HollandCincinnati Eye Institute, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Ali R DjalilianDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
University of Illinois Chicago · USShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRTufts University · USUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

Translational Core for Therapeutic and Diagnostic DevelopmentP30EY001792 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MCANANY, JAMES JASON · 1985 to 2025
$14.8M
Novel Therapies for Ocular Chemical InjuriesR01EY024349 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI DJALILIAN, ALI R · 2015 to 2020
$2.1M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001792NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn this article, we review the indications and latest management of high-risk penetrating keratoplasty. RECENT

findingsDespite the immune-privilege status of the cornea, immune-mediated graft rejection still remains the leading cause of corneal graft failure. This is particularly a problem in the high-risk graft recipients, namely patients with previous graft failure due to rejection and those with inflamed and vascularized corneal beds. A number of strategies including both local and systemic immunosuppression are currently used to increase the success rate of high-risk corneal grafts. Moreover, in cases of limbal stem cell deficiency, limbal stem cells transplantation is employed. SUMMARY: Corticosteroids are still the top medication for prevention and treatment in cases of corneal graft rejection. Single and combined administration of immunosuppressive agents e.g. tacrolimus, cyclosporine and mycophenolate are promising adjunctive therapies for prolonging graft survival. In the future, cellular and molecular therapies should allow us to achieve immunologic tolerance even in high-risk grafts.

Indexed as

CorneaGraft rejectionHigh riskImmunosuppressive drugsOcular surface disorderPenetrating keratoplasty

Identifiers

PMID28959505
PMCPMC5612422
OpenAlexW2583743825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.