Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28959469›Full record

ReviewStroke and vascular neurology2016

Cerebral aneurysm treatment: modern neurovascular techniques.

Bowen Jiang, Michelle Paff, Geoffrey P Colby, Alexander L Coon, Li-Mei Lin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stroke and vascular neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Uncovering SPP1Journal of inflammation research · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Identifying risk factors for perioperative thromboembolic complications in patients treated with the Woven EndoBridge device.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Definition and extraction of 2D shape indices of intracranial aneurysm necks for rupture risk assessment.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bowen JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Michelle PaffDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, UC Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California, USA.
Geoffrey P ColbyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Alexander L CoonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Li-Mei LinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, UC Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysm continues to evolve with the development of new technologies. This review provides an overview of the recent major innovations in the neurointerventional space in recent years.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresAnimalsCerebrovascular CirculationDiffusion of InnovationHumansIntracranial AneurysmTreatment OutcomeAneurysmBrainCoilDeviceFlow Diverter

Identifiers

PMID28959469
PMCPMC5435202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.