Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28959446›Full record

ArticleNetwork science (Cambridge University Press)2017

Dynamic Associations of Network Isolation and Smoking Behavior.

Molly Copeland, Bryce Bartlett, Jacob C Fisher

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network science (Cambridge University Press), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Molly CopelandDuke University, Department of Sociology, 276 Soc/Psych Building, 417 Chapel Dr. Durham, NC 27708; (919)660-5614.
Bryce BartlettDuke University, Department of Sociology, 276 Soc/Psych Building, 417 Chapel Dr. Durham, NC 27708; (919)660-5614.
Jacob C FisherDuke University, Department of Sociology, 276 Soc/Psych Building, 417 Chapel Dr. Durham, NC 27708; (919)660-5614.
Duke University · US

Funding

Partnership Model for Diffusion of Proven PreventionR01DA013709 · NIDA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2002 to 2017
$35.0M
Population Research InstituteR24HD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI JOHNSON, DAVID R · 2001 to 2016
$9.7M
The Population Research Institute: Development CoreP2CHD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Brian Thiede · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
T32 Administrative Supplement for Increase in Postdoc StipendsT32AG000139 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LYNCH, SCOTT M. · 1987 to 2017
$4.0M
Rural Family and Community Drug Abuse Prevention ProjectR01AA014702 · NIAAA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2003 to 2007
$3.0M
Friendship Networks and Emergence of Substance UseR01DA018225 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI FEINBERG, MARK ETHAN · 2007 to 2017
$2.9M
Models and Tools for Dynamic Health-Relevant Diffusion over Complex NetworksR01HD075712 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOODY, JAMES, MUCHA, PETER JOHN · 2013 to 2018
$1.8M
Focused Training in Social Networks and HealthR25HD079352 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOODY, JAMES · 2015 to 2024
$1.6M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA014702NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000139NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041025NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075712NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041025NICHD NIH HHS R25 HD079352NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013709NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prevailing social network frameworks examine the association between peer ties and behaviors, such as smoking, but the role of social isolates is poorly understood. Some theories predict isolated adolescents are protected from peer influence that increases smoking, while others suggest isolates are more likely to initiate smoking because they lack the social control provided by peer friendships. Building on a growing literature that seeks to explain these contradictions by moving beyond a homogeneous understanding of isolation, we identify the relationship between smoking and three distinct dimensions of isolation: avoided (adolescents who do not receive ties), withdrawn (adolescents who do not send ties), and externally oriented (adolescents who claim close out-of-grade friends). We examine the coevolutionary effects of these dimensions and cigarette smoking using an autoregressive latent trajectory model (ALT) with PROSPER Peers, a unique, longitudinal network dataset. These data include students (47% male and 86% white) from rural Iowa and Pennsylvania, ranging successively from grades 6-12 in eight waves of data. We find avoided isolation is associated with decreased subsequent smoking in high school. Smoking increases subsequent avoided and withdrawn isolation, but decreases external orientation.

Indexed as

adolescenceSEMsmokingsocial isolationsocial networkssubstance use

Identifiers

PMID28959446
PMCPMC5612432
OpenAlexW2606120755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.