Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28959194›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2017

Theta and Alpha Oscillations during the Retention Period of Working Memory by rTMS Stimulating the Parietal Lobe.

Song Li, Jing-Na Jin, Xin Wang, Hong-Zhi Qi, Zhi-Peng Liu, Tao Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Song LiInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeTianjin, China.
Jing-Na JinInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeTianjin, China.
Xin WangInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeTianjin, China.
Hong-Zhi QiLaboratory of Neural Engineering and Rehabilitation, Institute of Precision Instrument and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Tianjin UniversityTianjin, China.
Zhi-Peng LiuInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeTianjin, China.
Tao YinInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeTianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have shown that stimulating the parietal lobe, which plays a role in memory storage, can enhance performance during the "retention" process of working memory (WM). However, the mechanism of rTMS effect during this phase is still unclear. In this study, we stimulated the superior parietal lobe (SPL) using 5-Hz rTMS in 26 participants and recorded electroencephalography (EEG) while they performed a delayed-recognition WM task. The analyses included the comparisons of event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) value variations in theta (4-7 Hz) and alpha (8-14 Hz) band frequencies between conditions (rTMS vs. sham), as well as the correlations between different brain areas. Following rTMS, the ERSP values of theta-band oscillations were significantly increased in the parietal and occipital-parietal brain areas (

Indexed as

EEG frequencyparietal lobephase synchronizationretention period of working memoryrTMS

Identifiers

PMID28959194
PMCPMC5603655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.