Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28959191›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2017

Distinct Temporal Coordination of Spontaneous Population Activity between Basal Forebrain and Auditory Cortex.

Josue G Yague, Tomomi Tsunematsu, Shuzo Sakata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Josue G YagueStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of StrathclydeGlasgow, United Kingdom.
Tomomi TsunematsuStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of StrathclydeGlasgow, United Kingdom.
Shuzo SakataStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of StrathclydeGlasgow, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K016830/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M00905X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The basal forebrain (BF) has long been implicated in attention, learning and memory, and recent studies have established a causal relationship between artificial BF activation and arousal. However, neural ensemble dynamics in the BF still remains unclear. Here, recording neural population activity in the BF and comparing it with simultaneously recorded cortical population under both anesthetized and unanesthetized conditions, we investigate the difference in the structure of spontaneous population activity between the BF and the auditory cortex (AC) in mice. The AC neuronal population show a skewed spike rate distribution, a higher proportion of short (≤80 ms) inter-spike intervals (ISIs) and a rich repertoire of rhythmic firing across frequencies. Although the distribution of spontaneous firing rate in the BF is also skewed, a proportion of short ISIs can be explained by a Poisson model at short time scales (≤20 ms) and spike count correlations are lower compared to AC cells, with optogenetically identified cholinergic cell pairs showing exceptionally higher correlations. Furthermore, a smaller fraction of BF neurons shows spike-field entrainment across frequencies: a subset of BF neurons fire rhythmically at slow (≤6 Hz) frequencies, with varied phase preferences to ongoing field potentials, in contrast to a consistent phase preference of AC populations. Firing of these slow rhythmic BF cells is correlated to a greater degree than other rhythmic BF cell pairs. Overall, the fundamental difference in the structure of population activity between the AC and BF is their temporal coordination, in particular their operational timescales. These results suggest that BF neurons slowly modulate downstream populations whereas cortical circuits transmit signals on multiple timescales. Thus, the characterization of the neural ensemble dynamics in the BF provides further insight into the neural mechanisms, by which brain states are regulated.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAuditory CortexBasal ForebrainChannelrhodopsinsCholine O-AcetyltransferaseElectroencephalographyFemaleMaleMiceMice, TransgenicNerve NetNeuronsOptogeneticsParvalbuminsChannelrhodopsinsCholine O-AcetyltransferaseParvalbuminsacetylcholinebrain stateneural codingneural ensembleneural oscillationsoptogenetics

Identifiers

PMID28959191
PMCPMC5603709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.