Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28959161›Full record

ArticleRadiology and oncology2017

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation in Neoadjuvant Therapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Roberta Fusco, Mario Petrillo, Vincenza Granata, Salvatore Filice, Mario Sansone, Orlando Catalano, Antonella Petrillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology and oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Immunotherapy Assessment: A New Paradigm for Radiologists.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roberta FuscoRadiology Unit, Dipartimento di Supporto ai Percorsi Oncologici Area Diagnostica, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS -Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Mario PetrilloRadiology Unit, Dipartimento di Supporto ai Percorsi Oncologici Area Diagnostica, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS -Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Vincenza GranataRadiology Unit, Dipartimento di Supporto ai Percorsi Oncologici Area Diagnostica, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS -Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Salvatore FiliceRadiology Unit, Dipartimento di Supporto ai Percorsi Oncologici Area Diagnostica, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS -Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Mario SansoneDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Claudio, Naples, Italy.
Orlando CatalanoRadiology Unit, Dipartimento di Supporto ai Percorsi Oncologici Area Diagnostica, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS -Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Antonella PetrilloRadiology Unit, Dipartimento di Supporto ai Percorsi Oncologici Area Diagnostica, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS -Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the study was to present an update concerning several imaging modalities in diagnosis, staging and pre-surgery treatment response assessment in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Modalities include: traditional morphological magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional MRI such as dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). A systematic review about the diagnostic accuracy in neoadjuvant therapy response assessment of MRI, DCE-MRI, DWI and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) has been also reported.

methodsSeveral electronic databases were searched including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. All the studies included in this review reported findings about therapy response assessment in LARC by means of MRI, DCE-MRI, DWI and PET/CT with details about diagnostic accuracy, true and false negatives, true and false positives. Forest plot and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis were performed. Risk of bias and the applicability at study level were calculated.

resultsTwenty-five papers were identified. ROC curves analysis demonstrated that multimodal imaging integrating morphological and functional MRI features had the best accuracy both in term of sensitivity and specificity to evaluate preoperative therapy response in LARC. DCE-MRI following to PET/CT showed high diagnostic accuracy and their results are also more reliable than conventional MRI and DWI alone.

conclusionsMorphological MRI is the modality of choice for rectal cancer staging permitting a correct assessment of the disease extent, of the lymph node involvement, of the mesorectal fascia and of the sphincter complex for surgical planning. Multimodal imaging and functional DCE-MRI may also help in the assessment of treatment response allowing to guide the surgeon

Indexed as

evaluationlocally advanced rectal cancermagnetic resonance imagingneoadjuvant therapy

Identifiers

PMID28959161
PMCPMC5611989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.