Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28959143›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in infectious diseases2017

Surveillance and Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Breast Oncologic Surgery with Immediate Reconstruction.

Margaret A Olsen, Katelin B Nickel, Ida K Fox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret A OlsenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine.
Katelin B NickelDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine.
Ida K FoxDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine.
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

IMMEDIATE VS DELAYED RECONSTRUCTION AND BREAST CANCER SURGERY COMPLICATIONSR01CA149614 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI OLSEN, MARGARET A · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical site infection (SSI) after immediate breast reconstruction is much more common than would be expected after a clean surgical procedure. Although the SSI rates reported in individual studies are quite variable, there are no obvious explanations for the variation in infection rates between institutions. The microbiology of these SSIs is unusual, with higher proportions of infections caused by atypical Myobacterium species and Gram-negative bacilli than would be expected for this anatomic site. In an effort to prevent SSIs, many surgeons use a variety of different practices including irrigation and soaking of implants with antibiotic solutions and prolonged duration of prophylactic antibiotics, although the literature to support these practices is very sparse. In particular, prolonged use of antibiotics post-discharge is concerning due to the potential for harm, including increased risk of

Indexed as

breast reconstructionepidemiologymastectomypreventionrisk factorsSurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID28959143
PMCPMC5612330
OpenAlexW2613527954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.