Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28958991›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer therapeutics2017

Pathway-Enriched Gene Signature Associated with 53BP1 Response to PARP Inhibition in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Saima Hassan, Amanda Esch, Tiera Liby, Joe W Gray, Laura M Heiser

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Communications medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. FEN1 endonuclease as a therapeutic target for human cancers with defects in homologous recombination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. An engineered chimeric toxin that cleaves activated mutant and wild-type RAS inhibits tumor growth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Hypoxia Alters Epigenetic andFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Immune checkpoints and cancer in the immunogenomics era.Briefings in functional genomics · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Saima HassanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, OHSU Center for Spatial Systems Biomedicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. heiserl@ohsu.edu saima.hassan@umontreal.ca.
Amanda EschDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, OHSU Center for Spatial Systems Biomedicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Tiera LibyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, OHSU Center for Spatial Systems Biomedicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Joe W GrayDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, OHSU Center for Spatial Systems Biomedicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Laura M HeiserDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, OHSU Center for Spatial Systems Biomedicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. heiserl@ohsu.edu saima.hassan@umontreal.ca.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Systems-Based Predictions of Responses to Cancer TherapyU54CA112970 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI GRAY, JOE W. · 2004 to 2014
$27.1M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA112970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective treatment of patients with triple-negative (ER-negative, PR-negative, HER2-negative) breast cancer remains a challenge. Although PARP inhibitors are being evaluated in clinical trials, biomarkers are needed to identify patients who will most benefit from anti-PARP therapy. We determined the responses of three PARP inhibitors (veliparib, olaparib, and talazoparib) in a panel of eight triple-negative breast cancer cell lines. Therapeutic responses and cellular phenotypes were elucidated using high-content imaging and quantitative immunofluorescence to assess markers of DNA damage (53BP1) and apoptosis (cleaved PARP). We determined the pharmacodynamic changes as percentage of cells positive for 53BP1, mean number of 53BP1 foci per cell, and percentage of cells positive for cleaved PARP. Inspired by traditional dose-response measures of cell viability, an EC

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleHumansMicePoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsTP53BP1 protein, humanTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID28958991
PMCPMC5765867
OpenAlexW2756935441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.