ArticleJMIR cancer2017
The Impact of Participation in Online Cancer Communities on Patient Reported Outcomes: Systematic Review.
Article in JMIR cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Online Communities as a Driver for Patient Empowerment: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Online Support Groups for Perinatal Loss: A Pilot Feasibility Study for Women of Color.Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking · 2022Trial
- Effects of Psychoeducational Interventions Using Mobile Apps and Mobile-Based Online Group Discussions on Anxiety and Self-Esteem in Women With Breast Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Trial
- Engagement with INSPIRE, an Online Program for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Survivors.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2018Trial
- How Cancer Online Support Groups Work, for Whom, and in What Circumstances: Realist Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Review
- Self-help management of side effects in female cancer patients -analysis of the forum of the Women's Self-help Association against cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Evaluating the User-Perceived Benefit of a Virtual Lung Cancer Patient Education and Support Community: LVNG With Lung Cancer.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2024Article
- Internet Access and Use by Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cancers · 2024Article
- Enhancing Behavioural Changes: A Narrative Review on the Effectiveness of a Multifactorial APP-Based Intervention Integrating Physical Activity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Review
- Towards Agility in Breast Cancer Treatment Principles as Adopted from Agile Software Engineering.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Cancer Survivors' Experiences With and Preferences for Medical Information Disclosure and Advance Care Planning: An Online Survey Among Indonesian Cancer Support Groups.JCO global oncology · 2023Article
- Knowledge Acquisition and Social Support in Online Health Communities: Analysis of an Online Ovarian Cancer Community.JMIR cancer · 2022Article
- Comparing Survivors of Cancer in Population-Based Samples With Those in Online Cancer Communities: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study.JMIR cancer · 2022Article
- Netiquette for social media engagement for oncology professionals.Future oncology (London, England) · 2022Review
- Digital Technical and Informal Resources of Breast Cancer Patients From 2012 to 2020: Questionnaire-Based Longitudinal Trend Study.JMIR cancer · 2021Article
- Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Patterns of social media use and associations with psychosocial outcomes among breast and gynecologic cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2021Article
- A qualitative study of online support communities for lung cancer survivors on targeted therapies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- Assessing how health information needs of individuals with colorectal cancer are met across the care continuum: an international cross-sectional survey.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- Patients' Convergence of Mass and Interpersonal Communication on an Online Forum: Hybrid Methods Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, the question of how patients' participating in online communities affects various patient reported outcomes (PROs) has been investigated in several ways.
objectivesThis study aimed to systematically review all relevant literature identified using key search terms, with regard to, first, changes in PROs for cancer patients who participate in online communities and, second, the characteristics of patients who report such effects.
methodsA computerized search of the literature via PubMed (MEDLINE), PsycINFO (5 and 4 stars), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ScienceDirect was performed. Last search was conducted in June 2017. Studies with the following terms were included: (cancer patient) and (support group or health communities) and (online or Internet). A total of 21 studies were included and independently assessed by 2 investigators using an 11-item quality checklist.
resultsThe methodological quality of the selected studies varied: 12 were of high quality, eight were of adequate quality, and only one was of low quality. Most of the respondents were women (about 80%), most with breast cancer; their mean age was 50 years. The patients who were active in online support groups were mostly younger and more highly educated than the nonusers. The investigated PROs included general well-being (ie, mood and health), anxiety, depression, quality of life, posttraumatic growth, and cancer-related concerns. Only marginal effects-that is, PRO improvements-were found; in most cases they were insignificant, and in some cases they were contradictory.
conclusionsThe main shortcoming of this kind of study is the lack of methodological instruments for reliable measurements. Furthermore, some patients who participate in online communities or interact with peers via Internet do not expect to measure changes in their PROs. If cancer survivors want to meet other survivors and share information or get support, online communities can be a trustworthy and reliable platform to facilitate opportunities or possibilities to make this happen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.