Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28958738›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice

The Cost of Penicillin Allergy Evaluation.

Kimberly G Blumenthal, Yu Li, Aleena Banerji, Brian J Yun, Aidan A Long, Rochelle P Walensky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Quality and Consistency of Penicillin Allergy Delabelling Guidelines: A Systematic Review.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A call to action for penicillin allergy delabeling in patients with syphilis.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2025
    Article
  9. Direct oral challenges safely reduce the burden of low-risk cephalosporin allergy labels.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2025
    Article
  10. Proactive Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: Lessons Learned From a Quality Improvement Project.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  11. Building an allergy reconciliation module to eliminate allergy discrepancies in electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  12. Drug allergy.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  13. Impact of beta-lactam allergy labels on bone marrow transplant patients.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  14. Antibiotic use and financial impact of a comprehensive beta-lactam allergy management program.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Patient-related factors impact the implementation of inpatient antibiotic allergy delabeling.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2024
    Article
  17. How to Define and Manage Low-Risk Drug Allergy Labels.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2024
    Review
  18. Resource utilization and cost assessment of a proactive penicillin allergy de-labeling program for low-risk inpatients.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Article
  19. Penicillin allergy delabeling: Opportunities for implementation and dissemination.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kimberly G BlumenthalDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Edward P. Lawrence Center for Quality and Safety, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass. Electronic address: kblumenthal1@partners.org.
Yu LiDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Aleena BanerjiDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Brian J YunHarvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Aidan A LongDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Rochelle P WalenskyMedical Practice Evaluation Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.

Funding

The Clinical and Economic Impact of Penicillin AllergyK01AI125631 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BLUMENTHAL, KIMBERLY GOLD · 2016 to 2021
$779k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI125631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnverified penicillin allergy leads to adverse downstream clinical and economic sequelae. Penicillin allergy evaluation can be used to identify true, IgE-mediated allergy.

objectiveTo estimate the cost of penicillin allergy evaluation using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC).

methodsWe implemented TDABC throughout the care pathway for 30 outpatients presenting for penicillin allergy evaluation. The base-case evaluation included penicillin skin testing and a 1-step amoxicillin drug challenge, performed by an allergist. We varied assumptions about the provider type, clinical setting, procedure type, and personnel timing.

resultsThe base-case penicillin allergy evaluation costs $220 in 2016 US dollars: $98 for personnel, $119 for consumables, and $3 for space. In sensitivity analyses, lower cost estimates were achieved when only a drug challenge was performed (ie, no skin test, $84) and a nurse practitioner provider was used ($170). Adjusting for the probability of anaphylaxis did not result in a changed estimate ($220); although other analyses led to modest changes in the TDABC estimate ($214-$246), higher estimates were identified with changing to a low-demand practice setting ($268), a 50% increase in personnel times ($269), and including clinician documentation time ($288). In a least/most costly scenario analyses, the lowest TDABC estimate was $40 and the highest was $537.

conclusionsUsing TDABC, penicillin allergy evaluation costs $220; even with varied assumptions adjusting for operational challenges, clinical setting, and expanded testing, penicillin allergy evaluation still costs only about $540. This modest investment may be offset for patients treated with costly alternative antibiotics that also may result in adverse consequences.

Indexed as

Costs and Cost AnalysisAllergensAmbulatory CareAmoxicillinDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDrug HypersensitivityHumansImmunoglobulin EPenicillinsSkin TestsAllergensAmoxicillinImmunoglobulin EPenicillinsAllergyBeta-lactamChallengeHypersensitivityResourceSkin testTest dose

Identifiers

PMID28958738
PMCPMC5862726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.