Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28958660›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2019

Visual perception of the arm manipulates the experienced pleasantness of touch.

Anouk Keizer, Jutta R de Jong, Lianne Bartlema, Chris Dijkerman

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pleasantness Only?Experimental psychology · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anouk KeizerUtrecht University, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: a.keizer@uu.nl.
Jutta R de JongUtrecht University, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lianne BartlemaUtrecht University, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Chris DijkermanUtrecht University, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; University Medical Centre Utrecht, Department of Neurology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Touch, such as a caress, can be interpreted as very pleasant. The emotional valence assigned to touch is likely related to certain bottom-up factors, such as optimal activation of C-tactile (CT) afferents. It is however unclear if besides somatosensory input, contextual factors related to the own body also play a role in the perceived pleasantness of touch. To test this, we manipulated visual appearance of the participant's arm (veridical vision, no vision, pixelated moving statistic projected onto the arm (i.e. crawling skin)). We used slow velocity stroking (CT optimal stroking) with a soft brush to induce pleasant touch, and fast velocity stroking as a control condition. After each visual condition we asked participants (N=23) to rate the emotional valence of the stroking they felt. After slow velocity stroking ratings on perceived pleasantness (but not on perceived unpleasantness) were modulated by visual condition, with veridical vision of the arm resulting in higher pleasantness ratings than both no vision and pixelated vision. We conclude that contextual processes affect the perceived pleasantness of touch. These findings shed a new light on the underlying mechanisms of how humans experience pleasant touch and show that pleasant touch not solely dependents on bottom up information.

Indexed as

AdultArmEmotionsFemaleHumansMalePhysical StimulationTouchTouch PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAffective touchCT afferentsInterpersonal touchSocial touchTactile perception

Identifiers

PMID28958660
PMCPMC6968957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.