Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28958417›Full record

ReviewCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2018

Selective attention without a neocortex.

Richard J Krauzlis, Amarender R Bogadhi, James P Herman, Anil Bollimunta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Identification of movie encoding neurons enables movie recognition AI.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Visual neurons recognize complex image transformations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. When the central integrator disintegrates: A review of the role of the thalamus in cognition and dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Peri-Saccadic Orientation Identification Performance and Visual Neural Sensitivity Are Higher in the Upper Visual Field.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Costs and benefits of voluntary attention in crows.Royal Society open science · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard J KrauzlisLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, USA. Electronic address: richard.krauzlis@nih.gov.
Amarender R BogadhiLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, USA.
James P HermanLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, USA.
Anil BollimuntaLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, USA.
National Eye Institute · US

Funding

Visual CircuitsZIAEY000511 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI KRAUZLIS, RICHARD · 2012 to 2025
$28.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 EY999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA EY000511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective attention refers to the ability to restrict neural processing and behavioral responses to a relevant subset of available stimuli, while simultaneously excluding other valid stimuli from consideration. In primates and other mammals, descriptions of this ability typically emphasize the neural processing that takes place in the cerebral neocortex. However, non-mammals such as birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish, which completely lack a neocortex, also have the ability to selectively attend. In this article, we survey the behavioral evidence for selective attention in non-mammals, and review the midbrain and forebrain structures that are responsible. The ancestral forms of selective attention are presumably selective orienting behaviors, such as prey-catching and predator avoidance. These behaviors depend critically on a set of subcortical structures, including the optic tectum (OT), thalamus and striatum, that are highly conserved across vertebrate evolution. In contrast, the contributions of different pallial regions in the forebrain to selective attention have been subject to more substantial changes and reorganization. This evolutionary perspective makes plain that selective attention is not a function achieved de novo with the emergence of the neocortex, but instead is implemented by circuits accrued and modified over hundreds of millions of years, beginning well before the forebrain contained a neocortex. Determining how older subcortical circuits interact with the more recently evolved components in the neocortex will likely be crucial for understanding the complex properties of selective attention in primates and other mammals, and for identifying the etiology of attention disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionHumansNeocortexNeuronsOrientationSuperior ColliculiThalamusAttentionEvolutionNeocortexOptic tectumStriatumThalamus

Identifiers

PMID28958417
PMCPMC5832524
OpenAlexW2752037048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.