ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2018
Adaptive responses of murine osteoblasts subjected to coupled mechanical stimuli.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Restitution of the natural organization and orientation of cells is imperative for the construction of functional tissue scaffolds. While numerous studies have exploited mechanical methods to engineer tissues with the desired cellular architecture, fundamental knowledge is still lacking in understanding the manner in which morphological features can be modulated through coupled mechanical cues. To address this knowledge gap, the adhesion and alignment response of murine osteoblast cells under the synergistic effects of matrix rigidity and cyclic mechanical loading was investigated. This was accomplished by applying cyclic mechanical strain (1% at 0.05Hz) to MC3T3-E1 cells seeded on PDMS substrates of different elastic moduli (1.22, 1.70 and 2.04MPa). Results demonstrate that the overall cell density and expression of inactive vinculin increased on substrates subjected to cyclic stimulus in comparison to substrates under static loading. Conversely, in terms of the adhesion response, osteoblasts exhibited an increased growth of focal adhesion complexes under static substrates. Interestingly, results also elucidate that substrates of a stiffer matrix exposed to cyclic stimulus, had a significantly higher percentage of osteoblasts aligned parallel to the direction of the applied strain, as well as a higher degree of internal order with respect to the strain axis, in comparison to both cells seeded on substrates of lower stiffness under cyclic loading or under static conditions. These findings suggest the role of cyclic mechanical strain coupled with matrix rigidity in eliciting mechanosensitive adaptations in cell functions that allow for the reconstitution of the spatial and orientational assembly of cells in vivo for tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.