Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28957675›Full record

ReviewNeuron2017

Spine Dynamics: Are They All the Same?

Kalen P Berry, Elly Nedivi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 301 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
301citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
18.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

301 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 502 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dexmedetomidine Mitigates Sevoflurane-Induced Neurodevelopmental Effects in Paediatric Anaesthesia: A Meta-Analysis and Preclinical Study.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The working lives of neuronal 5-HTRSC chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Cue-Dependent Fear Learning Drives Nucleus Accumbens Spine Plasticity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Circular RNAScience advances · 2026
    Article
  18. Caudal Granular Insular Cortex to Somatosensory Cortex I: A Critical Pathway for the Transition of Acute to Chronic Pain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

241 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kalen P BerryPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Elly NediviPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Electronic address: nedivi@mit.edu.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

PRE-DOCTORAL TRAINING IN THE BIOLOGICAL SCIENCEST32GM007287 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BELL, STEPHEN P., KEATING, AMY E · 1985 to 2019
$40.8M
A Molecular Genetic Analysis of Cortical PlasticityR01EY011894 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI NEDIVI, ELLY · 2003 to 2016
$5.2M
In vivo imaging of inhibitory circuit remodeling in mouse visual cortexR01EY025437 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI NEDIVI, ELLY · 2015 to 2021
$2.5M
In Vivo Imaging of Neuronal Plasticity in Visual CortexR01EY017656 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI NEDIVI, ELLY, SO, PETER T. · 2008 to 2014
$2.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011894NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017656NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025437NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since Cajal's first drawings of Golgi stained neurons, generations of researchers have been fascinated by the small protrusions, termed spines, studding many neuronal dendrites. Most excitatory synapses in the mammalian CNS are located on dendritic spines, making spines convenient proxies for excitatory synaptic presence. When in vivo imaging revealed that dendritic spines are dynamic structures, their addition and elimination were interpreted as excitatory synapse gain and loss, respectively. Spine imaging has since become a popular assay for excitatory circuit remodeling. In this review, we re-evaluate the validity of using spine dynamics as a straightforward reflection of circuit rewiring. Recent studies tracking both spines and synaptic markers in vivo reveal that 20% of spines lack PSD-95 and are short lived. Although they account for most spine dynamics, their remodeling is unlikely to impact long-term network structure. We discuss distinct roles that spine dynamics can play in circuit remodeling depending on synaptic content.

Indexed as

AnimalsDendritic SpinesNerve Tissue ProteinsSynapsesNerve Tissue Proteinspostsynaptic density proteinsdendritic spinesexcitatory synapsesin vivo spine imagingPSD95structural remodelingsynapse formation

Identifiers

PMID28957675
PMCPMC5661952
OpenAlexW2760721217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.