Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28957523›Full record

ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2017

Integrating Ecological and Evolutionary Context in the Study of Maternal Stress.

Michael J Sheriff, Alison Bell, Rudy Boonstra, Ben Dantzer, Sophia G Lavergne, Katie E McGhee, Kirsty J MacLeod, Laurane Winandy, Cedric Zimmer, Oliver P Love

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prenatal stress accelerates offspring growth to compensate for reduced maternal investment across mammals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Sensitive phases in the development of rodent social behavior.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael J SheriffDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, Huck Institute of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Alison BellSchool of Integrative Biology, Program in Neuroscience, and Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign, IL 61821, USA.
Rudy BoonstraCentre for the Neurobiology of Stress, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4, Canada.
Ben DantzerDepartment of Psychology, and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Sophia G LavergneCentre for the Neurobiology of Stress, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4, Canada.
Katie E McGheeDepartment of Biology, the University of the South, Sewanee, TN 37383, USA.
Kirsty J MacLeodDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, Huck Institute of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Laurane WinandyCNRS, Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, ENFA, UMR5174 (Laboratoire Évolution and Diversité Biologique), 31077 Toulouse, France.
Cedric ZimmerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Oliver P LoveDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4, Canada.

Funding

Using sticklebacks as a model for identifying genes related to risk- taking behavR01GM082937 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BELL, ALISON MARIE · 2008 to 2018
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM082937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal stress can prenatally influence offspring phenotypes and there are an increasing number of ecological studies that are bringing to bear biomedical findings to natural systems. This is resulting in a shift from the perspective that maternal stress is unanimously costly, to one in which maternal stress may be beneficial to offspring. However, this adaptive perspective is in its infancy with much progress to still be made in understanding the role of maternal stress in natural systems. Our aim is to emphasize the importance of the ecological and evolutionary context within which adaptive hypotheses of maternal stress can be evaluated. We present five primary research areas where we think future research can make substantial progress: (1) understanding maternal and offspring control mechanisms that modulate exposure between maternal stress and subsequent offspring phenotype response; (2) understanding the dynamic nature of the interaction between mothers and their environment; (3) integrating offspring phenotypic responses and measuring both maternal and offspring fitness outcomes under real-life (either free-living or semi-natural) conditions; (4) empirically testing these fitness outcomes across relevant spatial and temporal environmental contexts (both pre- and post-natal environments); (5) examining the role of maternal stress effects in human-altered environments-i.e., do they limit or enhance fitness. To make progress, it is critical to understand the role of maternal stress in an ecological context and to do that, we must integrate across physiology, behavior, genetics, and evolution.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsEcologyEnvironmentHumansResearch DesignStress, Physiological

Identifiers

PMID28957523
PMCPMC5886325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.