Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28957466›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2017

Queens and Workers Contribute Differently to Adaptive Evolution in Bumble Bees and Honey Bees.

Brock A Harpur, Alivia Dey, Jennifer R Albert, Sani Patel, Heather M Hines, Martin Hasselmann, Laurence Packer, Amro Zayed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Evolution of Bees: Insights from 'Omic Studies.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Brain microRNAs among social and solitary bees.Royal Society open science · 2020
    Article
  11. Developmental plasticity shapes social traits and selection in a facultatively eusocial bee.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Brock A HarpurDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Alivia DeyDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Jennifer R AlbertDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Sani PatelDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Heather M HinesDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Martin HasselmannDepartment of Livestock Population Genomics, Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Laurence PackerDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Amro ZayedDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, Canada.
York University · CAPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Hohenheim · DEUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eusociality represents a major transition in evolution and is typified by cooperative brood care and reproductive division of labor between generations. In bees, this division of labor allows queens and workers to phenotypically specialize. Worker traits associated with helping are thought to be crucial to the fitness of a eusocial lineage, and recent studies of honey bees (genus Apis) have found that adaptively evolving genes often have worker-biased expression patterns. It is unclear however if worker-biased genes are disproportionately acted on by strong positive selection in all eusocial insects. We undertook a comparative population genomics study of bumble bees (Bombus) and honey bees to quantify natural selection on queen- and worker-biased genes across two levels of social complexity. Despite sharing a common eusocial ancestor, genes, and gene groups with the highest levels of positive selection were often unique within each genus, indicating that life history and the environment, but not sociality per se, drives patterns of adaptive molecular evolution. We uncovered differences in the contribution of queen- and worker-biased genes to adaptive evolution in bumble bees versus honey bees. Unlike honey bees, where worker-biased genes are enriched for signs of adaptive evolution, genes experiencing positive selection in bumble bees were predominately expressed by reproductive foundresses during the initial solitary-founding stage of colonies. Our study suggests that solitary founding is a major selective pressure and that the loss of queen totipotency may cause a change in the architecture of selective pressures upon the social insect genome.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalEvolution, MolecularSocial BehaviorAnimalsBeesFemaleGenetic FitnessMaleSelection, Geneticfitnesskin selectionnatural selectionsociality

Identifiers

PMID28957466
PMCPMC5622336
OpenAlexW2754641490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.