ArticleGenome biology and evolution2017
Queens and Workers Contribute Differently to Adaptive Evolution in Bumble Bees and Honey Bees.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Evolution of Bees: Insights from 'Omic Studies.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Review
- The Neuropeptide Neuroparsin-A Regulates the Establishment of Dominance Hierarchy in Bumblebees.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Leaf-damaging behavior by queens is widespread among bumblebee species.Communications biology · 2025Article
- The impact of geography and climate on the population structure and local adaptation in a wild bee.Evolutionary applications · 2023Article
- Thrice out of Asia and the adaptive radiation of the western honey bee.Science advances · 2021Article
- A combined RAD-Seq and WGS approach reveals the genomic basis of yellow color variation in bumble bee Bombus terrestris.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Gene expression and epigenetics reveal species-specific mechanisms acting upon common molecular pathways in the evolution of task division in bees.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Eusociality influences the strength of negative selection on insect genomes.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Brain microRNAs among social and solitary bees.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Developmental plasticity shapes social traits and selection in a facultatively eusocial bee.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Draft Genome Assembly and Population Genetics of an Agricultural Pollinator, the Solitary Alkali Bee (Halictidae:G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Conserved Genes Underlie Phenotypic Plasticity in an Incipiently Social Bee.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Insects with similar social complexity show convergent patterns of adaptive molecular evolution.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eusociality represents a major transition in evolution and is typified by cooperative brood care and reproductive division of labor between generations. In bees, this division of labor allows queens and workers to phenotypically specialize. Worker traits associated with helping are thought to be crucial to the fitness of a eusocial lineage, and recent studies of honey bees (genus Apis) have found that adaptively evolving genes often have worker-biased expression patterns. It is unclear however if worker-biased genes are disproportionately acted on by strong positive selection in all eusocial insects. We undertook a comparative population genomics study of bumble bees (Bombus) and honey bees to quantify natural selection on queen- and worker-biased genes across two levels of social complexity. Despite sharing a common eusocial ancestor, genes, and gene groups with the highest levels of positive selection were often unique within each genus, indicating that life history and the environment, but not sociality per se, drives patterns of adaptive molecular evolution. We uncovered differences in the contribution of queen- and worker-biased genes to adaptive evolution in bumble bees versus honey bees. Unlike honey bees, where worker-biased genes are enriched for signs of adaptive evolution, genes experiencing positive selection in bumble bees were predominately expressed by reproductive foundresses during the initial solitary-founding stage of colonies. Our study suggests that solitary founding is a major selective pressure and that the loss of queen totipotency may cause a change in the architecture of selective pressures upon the social insect genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.