Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28957438›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

E-cigarette aerosol exposure can cause craniofacial defects in Xenopus laevis embryos and mammalian neural crest cells.

Allyson E Kennedy, Suraj Kandalam, Rene Olivares-Navarrete, Amanda J G Dickinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The chemistry and toxicology of vaping.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2021
    Review
  18. Environmental mechanisms of orofacial clefts.Birth defects research · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Assessing the hazard of E-Cigarette flavor mixtures using zebrafish.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Allyson E KennedyVirginia Commonwealth University, Department of Biology, Richmond, VA, United States of America.
Suraj KandalamVirginia Commonwealth University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Richmond, VA, United States of America.
Rene Olivares-NavarreteVirginia Commonwealth University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Richmond, VA, United States of America.
Amanda J G DickinsonVirginia Commonwealth University, Department of Biology, Richmond, VA, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1427-9140

Funding

Perturbation of Craniofacial Morphogenesis, Healing, and Regeneration by E-cigarette Aerosol MixturesR56DE026024 · NIDCR · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI DICKINSON, AMANDA JANE, OLIVARES-NAVARRETE, RENE · 2016 to 2017
$447k
NIDCR NIH HHS R56 DE026024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since electronic cigarette (ECIG) introduction to American markets in 2007, vaping has surged in popularity. Many, including women of reproductive age, also believe that ECIG use is safer than traditional tobacco cigarettes and is not hazardous when pregnant. However, there are few studies investigating the effects of ECIG exposure on the developing embryo and nothing is known about potential effects on craniofacial development. Therefore, we have tested the effects of several aerosolized e-cigarette liquids (e-cigAM) in an in vivo craniofacial model, Xenopus laevis, as well as a mammalian neural crest cell line. Results demonstrate that e-cigAM exposure during embryonic development induces a variety of defects, including median facial clefts and midface hypoplasia in two of e-cigAMs tested e-cigAMs. Detailed quantitative analyses of the facial morphology revealed that nicotine is not the main factor in inducing craniofacial defects, but can exacerbate the effects of the other e-liquid components. Additionally, while two different e-cigAMs can have very similar consequences on facial appearances, there are subtle differences that could be due to the differences in e-cigAM components. Further assessment of embryos exposed to these particular e-cigAMs revealed cranial cartilage and muscle defects and a reduction in the blood supply to the face. Finally, the expression of markers for vascular and cartilage differentiation was reduced in a mammalian neural crest cell line corroborating the in vivo effects. Our work is the first to show that ECIG use could pose a potential hazard to the developing embryo and cause craniofacial birth defects. This emphasizes the need for more testing and regulation of this new popular product.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAerosolsAnimalsCraniofacial AbnormalitiesGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGlycerolMammalsNeural CrestNicotinePropylene GlycolXenopus laevisAerosolsGlycerolNicotinePropylene Glycol

Identifiers

PMID28957438
PMCPMC5619826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.